Atrial Pacing Site and Atrioventricular Conduction in Patients Paced for Sinus Node Disease

Atrial Pacing Site and Atrioventricular Conduction in Patients Paced for Sinus Node Disease

Atrial Pacing Site and AV Conduction Background Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2014-11, Vol.25 (11), p.1224-1231
Hauptverfasser: WATABE, TAICHI, ABE, HARUHIKO, KOHNO, RITSUKO, OGINOSAWA, YASUSHI, HAYASHI, KATSUHIDE, OHE, HISAHARU, TAMURA, MASAHITO, TAKEUCHI, MASAAKI, OTSUJI, YUTAKA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
atrial pacing
Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis
Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology
Atrioventricular Block - therapy
atrioventricular conduction
atrioventricular pacing
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Atria
Heart Conduction System - physiology
Humans
low atrial septum
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
right atrial appendage
Sick Sinus Syndrome - diagnosis
Sick Sinus Syndrome - physiopathology
Sick Sinus Syndrome - therapy
sinus node disease
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Atrial Pacing Site and AV Conduction Background Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial septal (LRAS) instead of right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. Methods We studied 102 dual‐chamber pacemaker recipients with SND. The PQ interval on 12‐lead electrocardiogram and the atrial paced to ventricular sensed interval (Ap‐Vs) during LRAS and RAA pacing were measured and compared at implantation, 3 months and 1 year of follow‐up. Group 1 included 62 patients with baseline PQ interval
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.12476