The potential inhalation hazard posed by dioxin-contaminated soil
Conservative models were used to estimate the airborne concentrations of 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) vapor and particulates originating from soil containing 100 ppb TCDD. The upper-bound estimates were 3.25 pg/m 3 of airborne TCDD vapor on-site and 0.51 pg/m 3 for TCDD vapor 100 meter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 1991, Vol.23 (11), p.1719-1729 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Conservative models were used to estimate the airborne concentrations of 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) vapor and particulates originating from soil containing 100 ppb TCDD. The upper-bound estimates were 3.25 pg/m
3 of airborne TCDD vapor on-site and 0.51 pg/m
3 for TCDD vapor 100 meters downwind. The TCDD air concentration on-site due to suspended particulate is estimated to be 1.4 pg/m
3, based on a TSP level of 0.07 mg/m
3. Assuming 70 years of continuous exposure to these concentrations, the upper-bound cancer risks determined from the Jury model were estimated to be 9.4 × 10
−6 to 1.1 × 10
−4 and 1.5 × 10
−6 to 1.7 × 10
−5 for inhalation of on- and off-site vapor, respectively, and 4.1 × 10
−6 to 4.6 × 10
−5 for dust inhalation. Since few sites have average soil concentrations as high as 100 ppb TCDD, this worst-case analysis indicates that inhalation will rarely, if ever, be a significant route of exposure to TCDD-contaminated soil. Experimental results support this claim and point to much lower risk estimates (8.4 × 10
−9 to 9.9 × 10
−8), suggesting that the parameters used in the Jury model are likely to overestimate the actual airborne levels of TCDD at contaminated sites. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0045-6535(91)90020-E |