Chromium(III) bound to DNA templates promotes increased polymerase processivity and decreased fidelity during replication in vitro

Carcinogenic chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are reduced intracellularly to DNA- and protein-reactive chromium(III) species. However, the role of Cr(III) ions in chromium-induced genotoxicity remains unclear. We have investigated the effects of chromium(III) binding on DNA replication and polymerase pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemistry (Easton) 1991-11, Vol.30 (47), p.11238-11245
Hauptverfasser: Snow, Elizabeth T, Xu, Li Sha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Carcinogenic chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are reduced intracellularly to DNA- and protein-reactive chromium(III) species. However, the role of Cr(III) ions in chromium-induced genotoxicity remains unclear. We have investigated the effects of chromium(III) binding on DNA replication and polymerase processivity in vitro. Chromium ions bind slowly and in a dose-dependent manner to DNA. Micromolar concentrations of free chromium inhibit DNA replication, but if the unbound chromium is removed by gel filtration, the rate of DNA replication by polymerase I (Klenow fragment) on the chromium-bound template is increased greater than 6-fold relative to the control. This increase is paralleled by as much as a 4-fold increase in processivity and a 2-fold decrease in replication fidelity. These effects are optimum when very low concentrations of chromium ions are bound to the DNA [3-4 Cr(III) ions per 1000 nucleotide phosphates]. Increased concentrations of chromium lead to the production of DNA-DNA cross-links and inhibition of polymerase activity. These results suggest that low levels of DNA-bound chromium(III) ions may contribute to chromium mutagenesis and carcinogenesis by altering the kinetics and fidelity of DNA replication.
ISSN:0006-2960
1520-4995
DOI:10.1021/bi00111a007