The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?

The objective of this paper is first to provide empirical evidence of what can be seen as a rather remarkable change in EU’s position on the use of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading (ET) in climate policy, from the role of a sceptic in the run-up to Kyoto towards more of a frontrunner. The pape...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climate Policy 2003, Vol.3 (1), p.3-18
Hauptverfasser: Christiansen, Atle C, Wettestad, Jørgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Climate Policy
container_volume 3
creator Christiansen, Atle C
Wettestad, Jørgen
description The objective of this paper is first to provide empirical evidence of what can be seen as a rather remarkable change in EU’s position on the use of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading (ET) in climate policy, from the role of a sceptic in the run-up to Kyoto towards more of a frontrunner. The paper argues that there is a synergistic and multilevel mix of explanatory factors for this “U-turn”, including developments at the international, EU, Member State, sub-national, and even down to the personal level. Second, the paper explores and discusses the philosophy behind the Commission’s proposal for a directive on GHG ET. Third, the paper examines the prospects for ‘success’ of a scheme for EU-wide ET using a multifaceted set of metrics. In brief, we argue that output success—the chances for having a directive adopted—hinges on the resolution of two key issues. First, whether the preliminary phase is to be mandatory or voluntary, and second, incompatibilities with domestic ET schemes. Outcome success—steering and cost-effectiveness—will in turn depend on factors like the coverage of the scheme and inclusion of project-based credits, while more long-term political implications hinges on the successful adoption and operation of the scheme. Environment Commissioner Margot Wallström.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00096-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16143578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1469306202000967</els_id><sourcerecordid>16143578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a95d0337c87652bc7cbd310e532a1d775b22d7e57429d42d441236e433a87b0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhntQcF39CUJOoodqvtq0XhaR9QMWPLh7Dmky20a6aU1aF_-9WStehYGBmXde5n2S5ILgG4JJfvtGeF6mDOf0CtNrjHGZp-Iomf2NT5LTEN5x1JaczZJ63QBabpAKSKGt79zgR-fAo86h2gO4phsDoDruYWdDsJ0LaPDKWFffoabbI2MNsgNqVN-DQ8oZtLdti4bJN4xaA5jFWXK8VW2A898-TzaPy_XDc7p6fXp5uF-lmrFiSFWZGcyY0IXIM1ppoSvDCIaMUUWMEFlFqRGQCU5Lw6nhnFCWA2dMFaLCwObJ5eTb--5jhDDI-LWGtlUOYhJJcsJZJooozCah9l0IHray93an_JckWB5Qyh-U8sBM4lgHlFLEu8V0BzHFpwUvg7bgNBjrQQ_SdPYfh28GL3xI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16143578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Christiansen, Atle C ; Wettestad, Jørgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Atle C ; Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this paper is first to provide empirical evidence of what can be seen as a rather remarkable change in EU’s position on the use of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading (ET) in climate policy, from the role of a sceptic in the run-up to Kyoto towards more of a frontrunner. The paper argues that there is a synergistic and multilevel mix of explanatory factors for this “U-turn”, including developments at the international, EU, Member State, sub-national, and even down to the personal level. Second, the paper explores and discusses the philosophy behind the Commission’s proposal for a directive on GHG ET. Third, the paper examines the prospects for ‘success’ of a scheme for EU-wide ET using a multifaceted set of metrics. In brief, we argue that output success—the chances for having a directive adopted—hinges on the resolution of two key issues. First, whether the preliminary phase is to be mandatory or voluntary, and second, incompatibilities with domestic ET schemes. Outcome success—steering and cost-effectiveness—will in turn depend on factors like the coverage of the scheme and inclusion of project-based credits, while more long-term political implications hinges on the successful adoption and operation of the scheme. Environment Commissioner Margot Wallström.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-3062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00096-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate policy ; Emissions trading ; Kyoto Protocol</subject><ispartof>Climate Policy, 2003, Vol.3 (1), p.3-18</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a95d0337c87652bc7cbd310e532a1d775b22d7e57429d42d441236e433a87b0e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,4010,4040,27899,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Atle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><title>The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?</title><title>Climate Policy</title><description>The objective of this paper is first to provide empirical evidence of what can be seen as a rather remarkable change in EU’s position on the use of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading (ET) in climate policy, from the role of a sceptic in the run-up to Kyoto towards more of a frontrunner. The paper argues that there is a synergistic and multilevel mix of explanatory factors for this “U-turn”, including developments at the international, EU, Member State, sub-national, and even down to the personal level. Second, the paper explores and discusses the philosophy behind the Commission’s proposal for a directive on GHG ET. Third, the paper examines the prospects for ‘success’ of a scheme for EU-wide ET using a multifaceted set of metrics. In brief, we argue that output success—the chances for having a directive adopted—hinges on the resolution of two key issues. First, whether the preliminary phase is to be mandatory or voluntary, and second, incompatibilities with domestic ET schemes. Outcome success—steering and cost-effectiveness—will in turn depend on factors like the coverage of the scheme and inclusion of project-based credits, while more long-term political implications hinges on the successful adoption and operation of the scheme. Environment Commissioner Margot Wallström.</description><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><issn>1469-3062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhntQcF39CUJOoodqvtq0XhaR9QMWPLh7Dmky20a6aU1aF_-9WStehYGBmXde5n2S5ILgG4JJfvtGeF6mDOf0CtNrjHGZp-Iomf2NT5LTEN5x1JaczZJ63QBabpAKSKGt79zgR-fAo86h2gO4phsDoDruYWdDsJ0LaPDKWFffoabbI2MNsgNqVN-DQ8oZtLdti4bJN4xaA5jFWXK8VW2A898-TzaPy_XDc7p6fXp5uF-lmrFiSFWZGcyY0IXIM1ppoSvDCIaMUUWMEFlFqRGQCU5Lw6nhnFCWA2dMFaLCwObJ5eTb--5jhDDI-LWGtlUOYhJJcsJZJooozCah9l0IHray93an_JckWB5Qyh-U8sBM4lgHlFLEu8V0BzHFpwUvg7bgNBjrQQ_SdPYfh28GL3xI</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Christiansen, Atle C</creator><creator>Wettestad, Jørgen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?</title><author>Christiansen, Atle C ; Wettestad, Jørgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a95d0337c87652bc7cbd310e532a1d775b22d7e57429d42d441236e433a87b0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Atle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Climate Policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christiansen, Atle C</au><au>Wettestad, Jørgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?</atitle><jtitle>Climate Policy</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>3-18</pages><issn>1469-3062</issn><abstract>The objective of this paper is first to provide empirical evidence of what can be seen as a rather remarkable change in EU’s position on the use of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading (ET) in climate policy, from the role of a sceptic in the run-up to Kyoto towards more of a frontrunner. The paper argues that there is a synergistic and multilevel mix of explanatory factors for this “U-turn”, including developments at the international, EU, Member State, sub-national, and even down to the personal level. Second, the paper explores and discusses the philosophy behind the Commission’s proposal for a directive on GHG ET. Third, the paper examines the prospects for ‘success’ of a scheme for EU-wide ET using a multifaceted set of metrics. In brief, we argue that output success—the chances for having a directive adopted—hinges on the resolution of two key issues. First, whether the preliminary phase is to be mandatory or voluntary, and second, incompatibilities with domestic ET schemes. Outcome success—steering and cost-effectiveness—will in turn depend on factors like the coverage of the scheme and inclusion of project-based credits, while more long-term political implications hinges on the successful adoption and operation of the scheme. Environment Commissioner Margot Wallström.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00096-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1469-3062
ispartof Climate Policy, 2003, Vol.3 (1), p.3-18
issn 1469-3062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16143578
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Climate policy
Emissions trading
Kyoto Protocol
title The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20EU%20as%20a%20frontrunner%20on%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20trading:%20how%20did%20it%20happen%20and%20will%20the%20EU%20succeed?&rft.jtitle=Climate%20Policy&rft.au=Christiansen,%20Atle%20C&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=3-18&rft.issn=1469-3062&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00096-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16143578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16143578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1469306202000967&rfr_iscdi=true