Glenoid bone loss: assessment with MR imaging

To investigate the agreement among magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, computed tomography (CT), and arthroscopy in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. One hundred seventy-six patients (158 male and 18 female patients; mean age, 26.8 year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2013-05, Vol.267 (2), p.496-502
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Ryan K L, Griffith, James F, Tong, Mabel M P, Sharma, Nimish, Yung, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the agreement among magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, computed tomography (CT), and arthroscopy in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. One hundred seventy-six patients (158 male and 18 female patients; mean age, 26.8 years ± 12.3) with anterior shoulder dislocation underwent both shoulder MR imaging and CT examination. Anterior straight line length, glenoid width, and best-fit bone loss were measured with MR imaging and CT. Sixty-five patients also underwent arthroscopy, which was used as the standard of reference. Assessment of glenoid bone loss at MR imaging was compared with that at CT and arthroscopy. Inter- and intrareader reproducibility of MR imaging-derived measurements of glenoid bone loss was evaluated. There was excellent correlation between CT and MR imaging with regard to anterior straight line length (r = 0.97, P < .0001), glenoid width (r = 0.95, P < .0001), and severity of glenoid bone loss-particularly with use of best-fit circle width (r = 0.83, P < .0001) rather than best-fit circle area (r = 0.82, P < .0001). In the assessment of glenoid bone loss, the correlation between CT and arthroscopy (r = 0.91, P < .0001) was marginally better than that between MR imaging and arthroscopy (r = 0.84, P < .0001). The inter- and intrareader correlations of MR imaging-derived measurements of glenoid bone loss were excellent (R = 0.90-0.95). MR imaging assessment of glenoid bone loss, particularly with use of glenoid width, is almost as accurate as CT assessment.
ISSN:0033-8419
1527-1315
DOI:10.1148/radiol.12121681