A three-dimensional electronic report of a venous echo color Doppler of the lower limbs: MEVeC registered

The reports of ultrasound evaluation of lower limb veins are difficult to understand by general practitioners (GPs) and physicians who are not specialized. We developed software for a three-dimensional (3D) electronic report of venous hemodynamic mapping (MEVeC registered ) in order to represent low...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular health and risk management 2014-09, Vol.10, p.549-555
Hauptverfasser: Galeandro, Aldo Innocente, Scicchitano, Pietro, Zito, Annapaola, Galeandro, Cristina, Gesualdo, Michele, Ciciarello, Francesco, Cecere, Annagrazia, Marzullo, Andrea, Contursi, Vincenzo, Annicchiarico, Annamaria, Ciccone, Marco Matteo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The reports of ultrasound evaluation of lower limb veins are difficult to understand by general practitioners (GPs) and physicians who are not specialized. We developed software for a three-dimensional (3D) electronic report of venous hemodynamic mapping (MEVeC registered ) in order to represent lower limb venous vasculature in a 3D way. The aim of the study is to compare the novel 3D report with the standard report. Thirty subjects (medical students and GPs) evaluated a standard report and a novel 3D report of the lower limb veins of a prespecified patient. The cases were randomly and blindly taken from an archive of 100 cases. GPs and students answered a questionnaire made up of 13 questions that were structured in order to investigate the readability and comprehension of the two reports. A score ranging from 0 to 10 (0= not understandable; 10= full comprehension) was attributed to each report for each question according to the readability of the venous scheme proposed. The scores from each question of the questionnaire were compared. The 3D report (MEVeC registered ) obtained higher scores than those from the evaluation of the standard report (P
ISSN:1176-6344
1178-2048
DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S63068