Non-heart transplant surgical approaches with left ventricular restoration and mitral valve operation for advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of non-heart transplant surgical approaches to advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), including left ventricular restoration (LVR) and mitral valve operation. METHODS Since September 2002, 102 consecutive patients (mean age 65, 18 f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2014-11, Vol.46 (5), p.849-856
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Yasunori, Shimura, Shinichiro, Aki, Akira, Furuya, Hidekazu, Odagiri, Shigeto, Okada, Kimiaki, Ueda, Toshihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of non-heart transplant surgical approaches to advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), including left ventricular restoration (LVR) and mitral valve operation. METHODS Since September 2002, 102 consecutive patients (mean age 65, 18 females) with advanced ICM [ejection fraction (EF) 60 ml/m2] were treated using non-heart transplant procedures. A total of 84 patients with asynergy of large scar exceeding 35% of left ventricular (LV) perimeter underwent LVR, and 30 patients with greater than or equal to moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) underwent mitral valve operation such as annuloplasty (n = 23) and valve replacement (n = 7). Patients were divided into four groups according to their interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support (INTERMACS) profiles: Profile 1–2 (the highest levels of clinical compromise; n = 9), Profile 3–4 (n = 40), Profile 5–6 (n = 32) and Profile ≥7 (n = 21). We compared the four groups, looking at survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, LV volume and function. RESULTS The overall 8-year survival including 3 hospital deaths (2.9%) was 64.3% without sudden death due to arrhythmia. Ninety-nine survivors showed significant improvement in the mean NYHA status, from 2.9 to 1.4, and the mean EF (33.2–41.7%) (P < 0.0001). The mean LVESVI was significantly reduced from 104.1 to 61.4 ml/m2 (41% volume reduction) (P < 0.0001). Seven-year survival in patients with Profiles 1–2, 3–4, 5–6 and ≥7 were 50.0, 57.2, 60.3 and 95.2%, respectively (P = 0.13). Freedom from MACCE at 5 years in patients with Profiles 1–2, 3–4, 5–6 and ≥7 were 29.6, 47.0, 67.2 and 95.2%, respectively (P = 0.0067). The improvements in NYHA status were significantly greater in patients with higher levels of clinical compromise (P < 0.0001), although, there was no significant difference in LV volume reduction and functional improvement among the four groups. Patients with Profile ≥7 had significantly better survival at 7 years (hazard ratio (HR): 0.11, P = 0.046) and freedom from MACCE at 5 years (HR: 0.053, P = 0.0066) compared with patients with Profiles 1–2. CONCLUSIONS Our non-heart transplant surgical approaches using LVR and mitral valve operation for advanced ICM yielded excellent long-term outcomes in terms of survival and NYHA status, even in patients who a
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezu011