Quantitative Determination of Liver Triglyceride Levels with 3T 1H-MR Spectroscopy in Mice with Moderately Elevated Liver Fat Content
To diagnose hepatic steatosis with noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR)–based measurements, threshold values of liver fat percentages are used. However, these differ between studies. Consequently, the choice of threshold values influences diagnostic accuracy, especially in subjects with borderline he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic radiology 2014-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1446-1454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To diagnose hepatic steatosis with noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR)–based measurements, threshold values of liver fat percentages are used. However, these differ between studies. Consequently, the choice of threshold values influences diagnostic accuracy, especially in subjects with borderline hepatic steatosis. In this study, we compared 1H-MR spectroscopy (MRS) and biochemically determined liver fat content in mice with moderately elevated fat content and studied the diagnostic accuracy of 1H-MRS using two literature-based threshold values.
Fifty mice were divided into three groups: 21 C57Bl/6OlaHSD (B6) mice on a high-fat diet, 20 B6 mice on a control diet, and 9 LDLr−/− mice on a high-fat high-cholesterol diet. 1H-MRS was performed using multi-echo STEAM at 3T to derive a fat mass fraction (1H-MRS fat content). Biochemical fat content was determined from liver homogenates. Correlation and agreement were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Bland–Altman analysis and diagnostic accuracy by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.
All mice were pooled to form a single cohort. Mean (±standard deviation) biochemical fat content was 32.2 (±13.9) mg/g. Mean 1H-MRS fat content did not differ at 30.2 (±12.0) mg/g (P = .13). Correlation r was 0.74 (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-6332 1878-4046 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.009 |