Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant

The effects of different light and soil nutrient conditions on foliar chemistry and acceptability of Inga oerstediana seedlings to leaf-cutter ants were investigated. I determined differences among (1) leaves that were initiated and matured under identical conditions but subsequently were subjected...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1991-10, Vol.72 (5), p.1609-1623
1. Verfasser: Nichols-Orians, Colin M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1623
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1609
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 72
creator Nichols-Orians, Colin M.
description The effects of different light and soil nutrient conditions on foliar chemistry and acceptability of Inga oerstediana seedlings to leaf-cutter ants were investigated. I determined differences among (1) leaves that were initiated and matured under identical conditions but subsequently were subjected to different light and fertilization treatments and (2) leaves that were initiated and matured under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments. I also assessed the relationship between environmentally induced differences in plant growth and the production of carbon-based secondary chemicals (specifically, tannins). Finally, I determined whether increases in tannins corresponded to decreases in the acceptability of leaves to leaf-cutter ants. Once a leaf matured the concentrations of tannins did not change as a function of light and soil nutrient conditions despite very large differences in growth rates among the treatments. Leaves that expanded to maturity under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments did differ in tannin chemistry, and treatment differences in plant growth rates appeared to dictate tannin chemistry. When growth was light limited, tannin concentrations were low, but when growth was nutrient limited, tannin concentrations were high. Only leaves that expanded to maturity under different environmental conditions differed in their acceptability to leaf-cutter ants. Decreases in tannins did not result in parallel increases in acceptability. Despite higher concentrations of tannins, leaf-cutter ants preferred the leaves of seedlings that were grown at 20% light over leaves of seedlings grown at 2% light. However, fertilization increased the acceptability of leaves when seedlings were grown at 20% light, a result consistent with the avoidance of very-high-tanning leaves. From these results I suggest that spatial variation in resource availability in lowland tropical rainforests would result in differences in tannin chemistry, and in susceptibility to leaf-cutter ants. However, temporal changes in resource availability would only be important to tannin chemistry and susceptibility if the duration of the change were long enough to allow new leaves to be produced.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1940961
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16098167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1940961</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1940961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-87d04a53dcf0db1838aa8fb1319a703f246c8d5ac6fce5fd2d52cd17fb81f70a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V2LEzEUBuAgCtZV_AtBxb0azUkmmcS7ZezqQkHB9cKrIc0HpEyTmmSU_nuztCgIzc25yMPLezgIvQTyjjIyvAfVEyXgEVqBYqpTMJDHaEUI0E4JLp-iZ6XsSHvQyxUK6_gr5BT3LlY9z0d8F-1inMUfg_cuu2hcwSHir7OOFd9nHWr5gMcUi_u5nH59yvjbUow71LANc6hHXBPWeOO078alVpfxTazP0ROv5-JenOcV-n67vh8_d5svn-7Gm01nOBGqk4MlvebMGk_sFiSTWku_BQZKD4R52gsjLddGeOO4t9RyaiwMfivBD0SzK_T2lHvIqVUsddqHVm5uC7i0lAkEURLE0OCr_-AuLTm2bhMFRYjqJW_o9SUEVImeDpLRpq5PyuRUSnZ-OuSw1_k4AZkerjKdr9Lkm3OeLkbPPutoQvnLOQMBQBpjJ_Y7zO54KW1ajz9AtQtT_rDVv_BdqSlf7PAHgq2k0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219009485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of different light and soil nutrient conditions on foliar chemistry and acceptability of Inga oerstediana seedlings to leaf-cutter ants were investigated. I determined differences among (1) leaves that were initiated and matured under identical conditions but subsequently were subjected to different light and fertilization treatments and (2) leaves that were initiated and matured under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments. I also assessed the relationship between environmentally induced differences in plant growth and the production of carbon-based secondary chemicals (specifically, tannins). Finally, I determined whether increases in tannins corresponded to decreases in the acceptability of leaves to leaf-cutter ants. Once a leaf matured the concentrations of tannins did not change as a function of light and soil nutrient conditions despite very large differences in growth rates among the treatments. Leaves that expanded to maturity under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments did differ in tannin chemistry, and treatment differences in plant growth rates appeared to dictate tannin chemistry. When growth was light limited, tannin concentrations were low, but when growth was nutrient limited, tannin concentrations were high. Only leaves that expanded to maturity under different environmental conditions differed in their acceptability to leaf-cutter ants. Decreases in tannins did not result in parallel increases in acceptability. Despite higher concentrations of tannins, leaf-cutter ants preferred the leaves of seedlings that were grown at 20% light over leaves of seedlings grown at 2% light. However, fertilization increased the acceptability of leaves when seedlings were grown at 20% light, a result consistent with the avoidance of very-high-tanning leaves. From these results I suggest that spatial variation in resource availability in lowland tropical rainforests would result in differences in tannin chemistry, and in susceptibility to leaf-cutter ants. However, temporal changes in resource availability would only be important to tannin chemistry and susceptibility if the duration of the change were long enough to allow new leaves to be produced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1940961</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Alluvial soils ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ants ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fertilization ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Formicidae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hymenoptera ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; Leaves ; Light ; Plant biochemistry ; Plants ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Seedlings ; Soil chemistry ; Soil nutrients ; Soils ; Tannins</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1991-10, Vol.72 (5), p.1609-1623</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1991 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Oct 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-87d04a53dcf0db1838aa8fb1319a703f246c8d5ac6fce5fd2d52cd17fb81f70a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1940961$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1940961$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5316110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>The effects of different light and soil nutrient conditions on foliar chemistry and acceptability of Inga oerstediana seedlings to leaf-cutter ants were investigated. I determined differences among (1) leaves that were initiated and matured under identical conditions but subsequently were subjected to different light and fertilization treatments and (2) leaves that were initiated and matured under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments. I also assessed the relationship between environmentally induced differences in plant growth and the production of carbon-based secondary chemicals (specifically, tannins). Finally, I determined whether increases in tannins corresponded to decreases in the acceptability of leaves to leaf-cutter ants. Once a leaf matured the concentrations of tannins did not change as a function of light and soil nutrient conditions despite very large differences in growth rates among the treatments. Leaves that expanded to maturity under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments did differ in tannin chemistry, and treatment differences in plant growth rates appeared to dictate tannin chemistry. When growth was light limited, tannin concentrations were low, but when growth was nutrient limited, tannin concentrations were high. Only leaves that expanded to maturity under different environmental conditions differed in their acceptability to leaf-cutter ants. Decreases in tannins did not result in parallel increases in acceptability. Despite higher concentrations of tannins, leaf-cutter ants preferred the leaves of seedlings that were grown at 20% light over leaves of seedlings grown at 2% light. However, fertilization increased the acceptability of leaves when seedlings were grown at 20% light, a result consistent with the avoidance of very-high-tanning leaves. From these results I suggest that spatial variation in resource availability in lowland tropical rainforests would result in differences in tannin chemistry, and in susceptibility to leaf-cutter ants. However, temporal changes in resource availability would only be important to tannin chemistry and susceptibility if the duration of the change were long enough to allow new leaves to be produced.</description><subject>Alluvial soils</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Plant biochemistry</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Tannins</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V2LEzEUBuAgCtZV_AtBxb0azUkmmcS7ZezqQkHB9cKrIc0HpEyTmmSU_nuztCgIzc25yMPLezgIvQTyjjIyvAfVEyXgEVqBYqpTMJDHaEUI0E4JLp-iZ6XsSHvQyxUK6_gr5BT3LlY9z0d8F-1inMUfg_cuu2hcwSHir7OOFd9nHWr5gMcUi_u5nH59yvjbUow71LANc6hHXBPWeOO078alVpfxTazP0ROv5-JenOcV-n67vh8_d5svn-7Gm01nOBGqk4MlvebMGk_sFiSTWku_BQZKD4R52gsjLddGeOO4t9RyaiwMfivBD0SzK_T2lHvIqVUsddqHVm5uC7i0lAkEURLE0OCr_-AuLTm2bhMFRYjqJW_o9SUEVImeDpLRpq5PyuRUSnZ-OuSw1_k4AZkerjKdr9Lkm3OeLkbPPutoQvnLOQMBQBpjJ_Y7zO54KW1ajz9AtQtT_rDVv_BdqSlf7PAHgq2k0w</recordid><startdate>199110</startdate><enddate>199110</enddate><creator>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199110</creationdate><title>Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant</title><author>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-87d04a53dcf0db1838aa8fb1319a703f246c8d5ac6fce5fd2d52cd17fb81f70a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Alluvial soils</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Plant biochemistry</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Tannins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichols-Orians, Colin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1991-10</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1609</spage><epage>1623</epage><pages>1609-1623</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The effects of different light and soil nutrient conditions on foliar chemistry and acceptability of Inga oerstediana seedlings to leaf-cutter ants were investigated. I determined differences among (1) leaves that were initiated and matured under identical conditions but subsequently were subjected to different light and fertilization treatments and (2) leaves that were initiated and matured under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments. I also assessed the relationship between environmentally induced differences in plant growth and the production of carbon-based secondary chemicals (specifically, tannins). Finally, I determined whether increases in tannins corresponded to decreases in the acceptability of leaves to leaf-cutter ants. Once a leaf matured the concentrations of tannins did not change as a function of light and soil nutrient conditions despite very large differences in growth rates among the treatments. Leaves that expanded to maturity under different soil, light, and fertilization treatments did differ in tannin chemistry, and treatment differences in plant growth rates appeared to dictate tannin chemistry. When growth was light limited, tannin concentrations were low, but when growth was nutrient limited, tannin concentrations were high. Only leaves that expanded to maturity under different environmental conditions differed in their acceptability to leaf-cutter ants. Decreases in tannins did not result in parallel increases in acceptability. Despite higher concentrations of tannins, leaf-cutter ants preferred the leaves of seedlings that were grown at 20% light over leaves of seedlings grown at 2% light. However, fertilization increased the acceptability of leaves when seedlings were grown at 20% light, a result consistent with the avoidance of very-high-tanning leaves. From these results I suggest that spatial variation in resource availability in lowland tropical rainforests would result in differences in tannin chemistry, and in susceptibility to leaf-cutter ants. However, temporal changes in resource availability would only be important to tannin chemistry and susceptibility if the duration of the change were long enough to allow new leaves to be produced.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1940961</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1991-10, Vol.72 (5), p.1609-1623
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16098167
source Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Alluvial soils
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Ants
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Fertilization
Flowers & plants
Formicidae
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hymenoptera
Insects
Invertebrates
Leaves
Light
Plant biochemistry
Plants
Protozoa. Invertebrata
Seedlings
Soil chemistry
Soil nutrients
Soils
Tannins
title Environmentally Induced Differences in Plant Traits: Consequences for Susceptibility to a Leaf-Cutter Ant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T06%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmentally%20Induced%20Differences%20in%20Plant%20Traits:%20Consequences%20for%20Susceptibility%20to%20a%20Leaf-Cutter%20Ant&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Nichols-Orians,%20Colin%20M.&rft.date=1991-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1609&rft.epage=1623&rft.pages=1609-1623&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1940961&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1940961%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219009485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1940961&rfr_iscdi=true