Outflow tract premature ventricular depolarizations after atrial fibrillation ablation may reflect autonomic influences

Purpose Autonomic modulation following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation may promote the development of catecholamine-sensitive arrhythmias, such as outflow tract (OT) ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and prognostic signifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2014-11, Vol.41 (2), p.187-192
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Parin J., Ahlemeyer, Lisa, Freas, Melanie, Cooper, Joshua M., Marchlinski, Francis E., Callans, David J., Hutchinson, Mathew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Autonomic modulation following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation may promote the development of catecholamine-sensitive arrhythmias, such as outflow tract (OT) ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and prognostic significance of OT VPDs occurring in patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods We prospectively examined 53 consecutive patients undergoing wide-area circumferential antral pulmonary vein (PV) isolation; no patients had evidence of OT VPDs on 24 h of preprocedural telemetry monitoring. Cases (OT+) had postprocedure telemetry monitoring with >30 continuous beats or >3/min OT VPDs. Clinical follow-up included transtelephonic monitoring at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Results The incidence of OT VPDs in this population was 11 % (6/53). There was no difference in AF recurrence at 1 year between those with or without OT VPDs (17 vs 28 %, p  = 0.6). There was a strong association with higher immediate postprocedure heart rate (HR) in OT+ compared to OT− patients (86 vs 76, p  = 0.03); this difference persisted at 1 year (79 vs 60, p  
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-014-9914-y