Comparison of 2 Methods to Estimate Density of an Endangered Lagomorph

We estimated densities of the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) at 5 habitat patches on Boca Chica Key, Monroe County, Florida, using pellet counting and direct enumeration from livetrapping. We compared density estimates from these 2 methods to an independent estimat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1997-01, Vol.61 (1), p.86-92
Hauptverfasser: Forys, Elizabeth A., Humphrey, Stephen R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We estimated densities of the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) at 5 habitat patches on Boca Chica Key, Monroe County, Florida, using pellet counting and direct enumeration from livetrapping. We compared density estimates from these 2 methods to an independent estimation of population size based on radiotracking data to determine which method would be best for long-term population monitoring. Density estimates were made 3 times per year for 2.5 years from March 1991 to July 1993. Significant correlations were found between pellet counting and radiotelemetry estimates (r2= 0.89, P < 0.0001) and between the livetrapping and radiotelemetry estimates (r2= 0.99, P < 0.0001). Pellet-counting estimates took 80% less time to perform than livetrapping estimates. Although livetrapping may have a higher correlation with actual population density, pellet counting provides an economic and efficient estimate that is well suited to long-term population monitoring.
ISSN:0022-541X
1937-2817
DOI:10.2307/3802417