Neurogenic hyperalgesia: the search for the primary cutaneous afferent fibers that contribute to capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia
T. K. Baumann, D. A. Simone, C. N. Shain and R. H. LaMotte Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510. 1. A local cutaneous injury can produce primary hyperalgesia within the injured area and secondary hyperalgesia in the normal surrounding skin. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1991-07, Vol.66 (1), p.212-227 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | T. K. Baumann, D. A. Simone, C. N. Shain and R. H. LaMotte
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
1. A local cutaneous injury can produce primary hyperalgesia within the
injured area and secondary hyperalgesia in the normal surrounding skin. An
intradermal injection of capsaicin in humans causes intense pain and
hyperalgesia to heat and to mechanical stimuli in the surrounding skin.
Psychophysical studies in humans supported the conclusions that the
hyperalgesia was predominantly the secondary type and depended on one set
of neurons sensitizing another ("neurogenic hyperalgesia") and that the
latter set of neurons is located in the central and not the peripheral
nervous system. To further test this hypothesis and to search for
peripheral neural mechanisms contributing to the pain and neurogenic
hyperalgesia from a local injury, we performed neurophysiological
experiments in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis) and recorded the responses
of cutaneous primary afferent fibers to an intradermal injection of
capsaicin and to mechanical and heat stimuli delivered before and after the
injection. 2. Most C- and A-fiber mechanoheat-sensitive nociceptive
afferent fibers (CMHs and AMHs, respectively) responded too weakly or
transiently to capsaicin to account quantitatively for the magnitude of
capsaicin pain. Of the known primary afferents tested with capsaicin
injections, only the responses of heat-selective nociceptors could
potentially account for the pain measured psychophysically in the human. In
addition, a novel type of primary afferent--tentatively termed
"chemonociceptive"--may have contributed as well. 3. Nociceptive fibers did
not become sensitized to either mechanical or heat stimulation after an
injection of capsaicin either outside, adjacent to, or inside the receptive
field (RF); any changes that occurred could not explain the hyperalgesia to
mechanical or heat stimuli observed in humans. 4. The depressed
responsiveness ("desensitization") of both myelinated and unmyelinated
nociceptive fibers in the monkey to heat and/or mechanical stimulation of
the injection site after capsaicin was injected inside their RFs correlated
with the analgesia observed at the capsaicin injection site in the human.
5. Capsaicin, topically applied to the RF in a vehicle of dimethyl
sulfoxide or alcohol, excited CMHs and AMHs and enhanced the responses of
some of these fibers to heat and/or to stroking the skin. In some c |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.1991.66.1.212 |