Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search
K. G. Thompson, D. P. Hanes, N. P. Bichot and J. D. Schall Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, USA. 1. The latency between the appearance of a popout search display and the eye movement to the oddball target of the display varies from trial to trial in both h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1996-12, Vol.76 (6), p.4040-4055 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | K. G. Thompson, D. P. Hanes, N. P. Bichot and J. D. Schall
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, USA.
1. The latency between the appearance of a popout search display and the
eye movement to the oddball target of the display varies from trial to
trial in both humans and monkeys. The source of the delay and variability
of reaction time is unknown but has been attributed to as yet poorly
defined decision processes. 2. We recorded neural activity in the frontal
eye field (FEF), an area regarded as playing a central role in producing
purposeful eye movements, of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performing a popout
visual search task. Eighty-four neurons with visually evoked activity were
analyzed. Twelve of these neurons had a phasic response associated with the
presentation of the visual stimulus. The remaining neurons had more tonic
responses that persisted through the saccade. Many of the neurons with more
tonic responses resembled visuomovement cells in that they had activity
that increased before a saccade into their response field. 3. The visual
response latencies of FEF neurons were determined with the use of a Poisson
spike train analysis. The mean visual latency was 67 ms (minimum = 35 ms,
maximum = 138 ms). The visual response latencies to the target presented
alone, to the target presented with distractors, or to the distractors did
not differ significantly. 4. The initial visual activation of FEF neurons
does not discriminate the target from the distractors of a popout visual
search stimulus array, but the activity evolves to a state that
discriminates whether the target of the search display is within the
receptive field. We tested the hypothesis that the source of variability of
saccade latency is the time taken by neurons involved in saccade
programming to select the target for the gaze shift. 5. With the use of an
analysis adapted from signal detection theory, we determined when the
activity of single FEF neurons can reliably indicate whether the target or
distractors are present within their response fields. The time of target
discrimination partitions the reaction time into a perceptual stage in
which target discrimination takes place, and a motor stage in which saccade
programming and generation take place. The time of target discrimination
occurred most often between 120 and 150 ms after stimulus presentation. 6.
We analyzed the time course of target discrimination in the activity of
single cells after separat |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.4040 |