Metarecognition in Time-Stressed Decision Making: Recognizing, Critiquing, and Correcting

We describe a framework for decision making, called the recognition/metacognition (R/M) model, that explains how decision makers handle uncertainty and novelty while exploiting their experience in real-world domains. The model describes a set of critical-thinking strategies that supplement recogniti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 1996-06, Vol.38 (2), p.206-219
Hauptverfasser: COHEN, MARVIN S., FREEMAN, JARED T., WOLF, STEVE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We describe a framework for decision making, called the recognition/metacognition (R/M) model, that explains how decision makers handle uncertainty and novelty while exploiting their experience in real-world domains. The model describes a set of critical-thinking strategies that supplement recognitional processes by verifying the results of recognition and correcting problems. Structured situation models causally organize information about a situation and provide a basis for metarecognitional processes. Metarecognitional processes determine when it is worthwhile to think more about a problem; identify evidence-conclusion relationships within a situation model; critique situation models for incompleteness, conflict, and unreliability; and prompt collection or retrieval of new information and revision of assumptions. We illustrate the R/M framework in the context of naval tactical decision making.
ISSN:0018-7208
1547-8181
DOI:10.1177/001872089606380203