The Connection Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision making (SOM) are both essential to quality health care, yet the interdependence between these 2 approaches is not generally appreciated. EBM should begin and end with the patient: after finding and appraising the evidence and integrating its inferenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2014-10, Vol.312 (13), p.1295-1296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision making (SOM) are both essential to quality health care, yet the interdependence between these 2 approaches is not generally appreciated. EBM should begin and end with the patient: after finding and appraising the evidence and integrating its inferences with their expertise, clinicians attempt a decision that reflects their patient's values and circumstances. Incorporating patient values, preferences, and circumstances is probably the most difficult and poorly mapped step--yet it receives the least attention. This has led to a common criticism that EBM ignores patients' values and preferences--explicitly not its intention. SOM is the process of clinician and patient jointly participating in a health decision after discussing the options, the benefits and harms, and considering the patient's values, preferences, and circumstances. It is the intersection of patient-centered communication skills and EBM, in the pinnacle of good patient care. Here, Hoffman et al examine the connection between the EBM and SDM. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.2014.10186 |