COUNTS OF GROWTH LAYER GROUPS IN CEMENTUM AND DENTINE IN RINGED SEALS (PHOCA HISPIDA)

We compared counts of growth layer groups (GLGs) in the dentine of un‐decalcified, unstained cross‐sections and in the cementum of decalcified, stained longitudinal sections of canine teeth from 144 ringed seals (Phoca hispida). Although there was a statistically significant correlation until approx...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine mammal science 1996-07, Vol.12 (3), p.383-401
Hauptverfasser: Stewart, Robert E. A., Stewart, Barbara E., Stirling, Ian, Street, Elaine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compared counts of growth layer groups (GLGs) in the dentine of un‐decalcified, unstained cross‐sections and in the cementum of decalcified, stained longitudinal sections of canine teeth from 144 ringed seals (Phoca hispida). Although there was a statistically significant correlation until approximately 10 GLGs, about 75% of paired readings at ≤ 10 cementum GLGs disagreed. After 10 GLGs, the number of GLGs in the cementum usually was greater. The maximum GLG count in cementum was 33, compared to a maximum in dentine of only 19. Interobserver differences in median counts were not statistically significant using cementum or dentine counts. Regression analysis revealed that for cementum in female seals, readers differed at higher counts (P < 0.05), and for dentine, there was a constant difference of about 0.6 GLGs (P < 0.05) for male seals and 1.1 GLGs (P < 0.05) for female seals. Counting GLGs in the cementum of decalcified and stained longitudinal sections provided higher counts and more agreement between readers, and it was the better of the methods examined for ageing ringed seals.
ISSN:0824-0469
1748-7692
DOI:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1996.tb00591.x