Measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility and agreement compared to two-dimensional echocardiography

Recent guidelines regard three-dimensional echocardiography (DE) derived measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) as the method of choice. The feasibility of 3DE and agreement between 2DE and 3DE was examined. Our hypothesis was that a number of patients can only be e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2014-10, Vol.30 (7), p.1325-1330
Hauptverfasser: Ruddox, Vidar, Edvardsen, Thor, Bækkevar, Morten, Otterstad, Jan Erik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent guidelines regard three-dimensional echocardiography (DE) derived measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) as the method of choice. The feasibility of 3DE and agreement between 2DE and 3DE was examined. Our hypothesis was that a number of patients can only be examined with 2DE in a patient population admitted to a general hospital. Hospitalised patients referred for echocardiography by residents on call who found grounds to perform a pocket-sized ultrasound examination (PCU) were included. A subsequent 2DE and 3DE was planned. 3DE was considered unfeasible in the presence of irregular heart rhythm and poor quality imaging (included inability to hold breath). Agreement was evaluated with correlation and Bland–Altman analyses. Of 273 consecutive patients examined with 2DE, 202 (74 %) had satisfactory 3DE images for LV volume and EF measurements. Reasons for exclusion of 71 patients from the 3DE study included irregular heart rhythm in 58 patients and poor quality images in 13 patients. Median LV end-diastolic volume was 146 mL with 3DE and 161 mL with 2DE ( p  
ISSN:1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
DOI:10.1007/s10554-014-0478-9