Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with psoriasis
Background Psoriasis is an inflammatory disorder, which has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular (CV) risks. Although increased CV risks in psoriasis are well established, there are no data about changes of contraction synchrony in psoriasis. Therefore, we aimed to study the left ventr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of dermatology 2014-10, Vol.53 (10), p.1221-1227 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Psoriasis is an inflammatory disorder, which has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular (CV) risks. Although increased CV risks in psoriasis are well established, there are no data about changes of contraction synchrony in psoriasis. Therefore, we aimed to study the left ventricular (LV) contraction synchrony in patients with psoriasis with narrow QRS and normal ejection fraction.
Methods
Fifty patients with psoriasis and 50 age‐ and sex‐matched control subjects were included in the study. LV dyssynchrony was investigated by color‐coded tissue Doppler imaging.
Results
In the psoriasis group, the mean high‐sensitive C‐reactive protein values were significantly higher compared with the controls. Peak A velocity, deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time, and E/E′ values were higher in the psoriasis group; however, E/A ratio and average Em were higher in the control group. LV systolic dyssynchrony parameters [including standard deviation of Ts of the 12 LV segments (Ts‐SD‐12), maximal difference in Ts between any two of the 12 LV segments, standard deviation of Ts of the six basal LV segments, and maximal difference in Ts between any two of the six basal LV segments] were found to be higher in the psoriasis group. The patients with ventricular dyssynchrony (a Ts‐SD‐12 >34.4 ms) were higher in the psoriasis group than the control group (34% vs. 6%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-9059 1365-4632 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ijd.12192 |