Feasibility, Effectiveness and Costs Associated with a Web-Based Follow-Up Assessment Following Total Joint Arthroplasty
Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We exclu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1723-1728 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We excluded patients who had revision surgery, osteolysis, complications or identified radiographic issues. 229 patients (118 Web, 111 in-person) completed the study. There were no patients who had an issue missed by the web-based follow-up. Patients in the web-based group travelled less (28.2 km vs 103.7 km, ( P < 0.01)), had lower associated costs ($10.45 vs $21.36, ( P < 0.01)) and took less time to complete (121.7 min web vs 228.7 min usual). Web-based follow-up is a feasible, clinically effective alternative with lower associated costs than in-person clinic assessment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.003 |