Feasibility, Effectiveness and Costs Associated with a Web-Based Follow-Up Assessment Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We exclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1723-1728
Hauptverfasser: Marsh, Jacquelyn D., MSc, PhD, Bryant, Dianne M., MSc, PhD, MacDonald, Steven J., MD, FRCSC, Naudie, Douglas D.R., MD, FRCSC, McCalden, Richard W., MD, FRCSC, Howard, James L., MD, FRCSC, Bourne, Robert B., MD, FRCSC, McAuley, James P., MD, FRCSC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We excluded patients who had revision surgery, osteolysis, complications or identified radiographic issues. 229 patients (118 Web, 111 in-person) completed the study. There were no patients who had an issue missed by the web-based follow-up. Patients in the web-based group travelled less (28.2 km vs 103.7 km, ( P < 0.01)), had lower associated costs ($10.45 vs $21.36, ( P < 0.01)) and took less time to complete (121.7 min web vs 228.7 min usual). Web-based follow-up is a feasible, clinically effective alternative with lower associated costs than in-person clinic assessment.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.003