Discordance in Histopathologic Evaluation of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy with Clinical Follow-Up: Results from a Prospectively Collected Database

Background Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status currently represents the single most important prognostic factor in clinically localized melanoma and is widely used in patients with melanoma at significant risk for nodal micrometastasis. Although several studies have looked at the rates and implications of inaccuracies in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, accuracy in the histologic interpretation of the SLN in melanoma has not been addressed. The goal of this study was to determine the rates of discordance in the histopathologic evaluation of the SLN and the potential clinical impact on patients referred to a comprehensive melanoma center. Methods A prospectively collected database was queried for melanoma patients who had SLN biopsies performed at outside institutions before referral to the University of Michigan Multidisciplinary Melanoma Program between 2006 and 2009. These cases were reviewed and clinical follow-up obtained. Results After internal review of the SLN material, 13 (8 %) of 167 cases had major discrepancies in diagnosis that impacted patient management and prognosis. The disease of five patients was subsequently downstaged and the disease of eight patients was upstaged after internal review of the SLNs and reversal in diagnoses. Conclusions There appears to be a small yet significant rate of discordance in diagnosis of the SLN for melanoma after expert histopathologic review. The implications of this discordance and revision of diagnosis is substantial. Expert histopathologic review of the SLN warrants consideration to provide the most accurate prognostic information and optimal patient care.