Predictors for Cecal Insertion Time: The Impact of Abdominal Visceral Fat Measured by Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND:Several factors affect the risk for longer cecal insertion time. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of longer insertion time and to evaluate the effect of visceral fat measured by CT. DESIGN:This is a retrospective observational study. PATIENTS:Outpatients for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2014-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1213-1219
Hauptverfasser: Nagata, Naoyoshi, Sakamoto, Kayo, Arai, Tomohiro, Niikura, Ryota, Shimbo, Takuro, Shinozaki, Masafumi, Noda, Mitsuhiko, Uemura, Naomi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Several factors affect the risk for longer cecal insertion time. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of longer insertion time and to evaluate the effect of visceral fat measured by CT. DESIGN:This is a retrospective observational study. PATIENTS:Outpatients for colorectal cancer screening who underwent colonoscopies and CT were enrolled. Computed tomography was performed in individuals who requested cancer screening and in those with GI bleeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Information on obesity indices (BMI, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue area), constipation score, history of abdominal surgery, poor preparation, fellow involvement, diverticulosis, patient discomfort, and the amount of sedation used was collected. RESULTS:The cecal insertion rate was 95.2% (899/944), and 899 patients were analyzed. Multiple regression analysis showed that female sex, lower BMI, lower visceral adipose tissue area, lower subcutaneous adipose tissue area, higher constipation score, history of surgery, poor bowel preparation, and fellow involvement were independently associated with longer insertion time. When obesity indices were considered simultaneously, smaller subcutaneous adipose tissue area (p = 0.038), but not lower BMI (p = 0.802) or smaller visceral adipose tissue area (p = 0.856), was associated with longer insertion time; the other aforementioned factors remained associated with longer insertion time. In the subanalysis of normal-weight patients (BMI
ISSN:0012-3706
1530-0358
DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000203