Reliability and validity of the beck depression inventory-fast screen for medical patients in the general German population
Abstract Background The Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen ( BDI-FS ) is a self-report instrument for the detection of depression in youths and adults. It measures the severity of the depression, corresponding to the non-somatic criteria for the diagnosis of a major depression according to DSM-5....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2014-03, Vol.156, p.236-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background The Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen ( BDI-FS ) is a self-report instrument for the detection of depression in youths and adults. It measures the severity of the depression, corresponding to the non-somatic criteria for the diagnosis of a major depression according to DSM-5. Until now the psychometric properties of the instrument have not been studied in the general population. Methods In 2012, a survey representative for the Federal Republic of Germany was conducted. In addition to the BDI-FS , further self-rating questionnaires as well as a demographic questionnaire were administered. Results Altogether, 4480 people were surveyed with a return rate of 56.1% ( N =2467 persons). Approximately 53% of those surveyed were women. The average age was 49.4 years (SD=18.0), with a range of 14–91 years. For the BDI-FS total-scores, a coefficient α of .84 was determined (women: α =.83; men: α =.85). In addition, a convergent validity ( r =.67) was determined with the Patient Health Questionnaire ( PHQ-9 ). The discriminant validity of the BDI-FS can be classified as satisfactory. Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, the one-dimensionality of the BDI-FS could be confirmed, achieving very good fit indices (total sample: RMSEA=.058, CFI=.990, TLI=.986). An additional invariance analysis regarding gender, different age groups and their interaction resulted in strict invariance for the different multi-group analyses. Limitations Studies regarding stability have yet to be undertaken. A standard diagnostic interview for depression was not included. Conclusion The results support the reliability and validity of the BDI-FS for use with the general German population. Although in the present studies the BDI-FS was superior to the PHQ-9 in terms of its ability to discriminate between depressive and somatic symptoms, in future investigations the diagnostic efficiency of the BDI-FS should be compared with this and other depression inventories (e.g., PHQ-2 , PHQ-8 , and CES-D ). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.024 |