Pet exposure and risk of atopic dermatitis at the pediatric age: A meta-analysis of birth cohort studies

Background Findings on pet exposure and the risk of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children are inconsistent. Objective With the aim to summarize the results of exposure to different pets on AD, we undertook a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on this issue. Methods In August 2012, we conducted a sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.616-622.e7
Hauptverfasser: Pelucchi, Claudio, ScD, Galeone, Carlotta, PhD, Bach, Jean-François, MD, DSc, La Vecchia, Carlo, MD, Chatenoud, Liliane, ScD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Findings on pet exposure and the risk of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children are inconsistent. Objective With the aim to summarize the results of exposure to different pets on AD, we undertook a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on this issue. Methods In August 2012, we conducted a systematic literature search in Medline and Embase. We included analytic studies considering exposure to dogs, cats, other pets, or pets overall during pregnancy, infancy, and/or childhood, with AD assessment performed during infancy or childhood. We calculated summary relative risks and 95% CIs using both fixed- and random-effects models. We computed summary estimates across selected subgroups. Results Twenty-six publications from 21 birth cohort studies were used in the meta-analyses. The pooled relative risks of AD for exposure versus no exposure were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.85; I 2  = 46%; results based on 15 studies) for exposure to dogs, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76-1.16; I 2  = 54%; results based on 13 studies) for exposure to cats, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.85; I 2  = 54%; results based on 11 studies) for exposure to pets overall. No heterogeneity emerged across the subgroups examined, except for geographic area. Conclusion This meta-analysis reported a favorable effect of exposure to dogs and pets on the risk of AD in infants or children, whereas no association emerged with exposure to cats.
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.009