Modeling adsorption in binary associating solvents using the extended MPTA model

Application of the MPTA model has been extended to associative liquid adsorption. The MPTA model describes fluid–fluid interactions using an equation of state (EoS) term, and fluid–solid interactions using a potential equation. In order to extend the application to associative liquid adsorption, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Adsorption : journal of the International Adsorption Society 2014, Vol.20 (4), p.555-563
Hauptverfasser: Naseri, Ali Asghar, Dehghani, Mohammad Reza, Behzadi, Bahman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Application of the MPTA model has been extended to associative liquid adsorption. The MPTA model describes fluid–fluid interactions using an equation of state (EoS) term, and fluid–solid interactions using a potential equation. In order to extend the application to associative liquid adsorption, an association term has been considered for fluid–fluid interactions. Sixteen binary mixtures containing associating and non-associating components in equilibrium with various adsorbents have been studied; fluid–fluid interactions have been modeled using the Peng–Robinson, Soave–Redlich–Kwong, volume-translated SRK and CPA equations of state, while the effects of fluid–solid interactions have been taken into account using Dubinin–Radushkevich–Astakhov (DRA) and Steele potential functions. The model parameters have been obtained by fitting the model to experimental data on surface excess. For the studied systems, the accuracy of fitted isotherms has been found to be more dependent on the fluid–solid potential equation rather than the applied EoS. Calculations show that the SRK equation is a suitable choice for non-associating systems, while the CPA equation is found to be more appropriate for associating systems, as would be expected. The results also show that the Steele potential function is in better agreement with experimental data than the DRA potential function.
ISSN:0929-5607
1572-8757
DOI:10.1007/s10450-013-9600-x