Treatment of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation: atlantoaxial joint distraction and fixation with transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) without odontoidectomy
Purpose Although direct transoral decompression and one-stage posterior instrumentation can obtain satisfactory cord decompression for the treatment of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation, surgical injuries run high as combinative anterior-posterior approaches were necessary. Furtherm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2014-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1648-1655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Although direct transoral decompression and one-stage posterior instrumentation can obtain satisfactory cord decompression for the treatment of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation, surgical injuries run high as combinative anterior-posterior approaches were necessary. Furthermore, the complications will rise notably when involvement of dens and/or clivus in the decompression necessitates relatively complicated surgical techniques. First initiated in 2005, transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) works as an internal fixation for the treatment of basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Therefore, this article aimed to describe several operative experiences about this approach, which has delivered successful decompression, fixation and fusion.
Methods
21 consecutive patients with basilar invagination underwent the TARP operation. The pre- and postoperative medulla-cervical angles were measured and compared. The JOA scores of spinal cord function were calculated pre- and post-operatively. 20 cases (20/21) were followed up to average 12.5 months.
Results
Symptoms of all the 20 cases were relieved in different degrees. The postoperative imaging showed the odontoid processes obtained ideal reduction and the internal fixators were all in good position. The medulla-cervical angle was correctd from an average (± standard deviation) 128.7° + 11.9° (
n
= 20) before surgery to 156.5° + 8.1° (
n
= 20) after surgery (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00586-014-3378-8 |