Dysmotility by mechanical bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol

Abstract Background The effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on morbidity (e.g., anastomotic leakage and surgical site infection) have been evaluated. Its effect on early recovery after surgery has drawn renewed attention, and its use is discouraged in the postsurgical management of enhance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2014-09, Vol.191 (1), p.84-90
Hauptverfasser: Yamada, Takeshi, MD, PhD, Kan, Hayato, MD, PhD, Matsumoto, Satoshi, MD, PhD, Koizumi, Michihiro, MD, PhD, Matsuda, Akihisa, MD, PhD, Shinji, Seiichi, MD, PhD, Sasaki, Junpei, MD, PhD, Uchida, Eiji, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on morbidity (e.g., anastomotic leakage and surgical site infection) have been evaluated. Its effect on early recovery after surgery has drawn renewed attention, and its use is discouraged in the postsurgical management of enhanced recovery. However, most surgeons in Japan prefer polyethylene glycol (PEG) for MBP. We investigated the effect of MBP with PEG on postoperative intestinal motility. Materials and methods We prospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 258 colon cancer patients who underwent colonic resection and primary anastomosis. We orally administered 2000 mL of PEG in the PEG group and did not administer PEG to patients in the no-PEG group. Postoperative gastrointestinal motility was assessed with radiopaque markers. All patients ingested radiopaque markers 2 h before surgery. Postoperative intestinal motility was radiologically assessed by counting the number of residual markers. Abdominal radiography was conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 to count residual markers in the large and small intestines. Results The total number of residual markers in the no-PEG group was less than that in the PEG group on day 5 ( P  
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.001