Major alterations in transcript profiles between C3–C4 and C4 photosynthesis of an amphibious species Eleocharis baldwinii

Engineering C 4 photosynthetic metabolism into C 3 crops is regarded as a major strategy to increase crop productivity, and clarification of the evolutionary processes of C 4 photosynthesis can help the better use of this strategy. Here, Eleocharis baldwinii , a species in which C 4 photosynthesis c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant molecular biology 2014-09, Vol.86 (1-2), p.93-110
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Taiyu, Zhu, Xin-Guang, Lin, Yongjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Engineering C 4 photosynthetic metabolism into C 3 crops is regarded as a major strategy to increase crop productivity, and clarification of the evolutionary processes of C 4 photosynthesis can help the better use of this strategy. Here, Eleocharis baldwinii , a species in which C 4 photosynthesis can be induced from a C 3 – C 4 state under either environmental or ABA treatments, was used to identify the major transcriptional modifications during the process from C 3 – C 4 to C 4 . The transcriptomic comparison suggested that in addition to the major differences in C 4 core pathway, the pathways of glycolysis, citrate acid metabolism and protein synthesis were dramatically modified during the inducement of C 4 photosynthetic states. Transcripts of many transporters, including not only metabolite transporters but also ion transporters, were dramatically increased in C 4 photosynthetic state. Many candidate regulatory genes with unidentified functions were differentially expressed in C 3 – C 4 and C 4 photosynthetic states. Finally, it was indicated that ABA, auxin signaling and DNA methylation play critical roles in the regulation of C 4 photosynthesis. In summary, by studying the different photosynthetic states of the same species, this work provides the major transcriptional differences between C 3 – C 4 and C 4 photosynthesis, and many of the transcriptional differences are potentially related to C 4 development and therefore are the potential targets for reverse genetics studies.
ISSN:0167-4412
1573-5028
DOI:10.1007/s11103-014-0215-8