A New Measurement Method in Graf Technique: Prediction of Future Acetabular Development Is Possible in Physiologically Immature Hips

BACKGROUND:Universal ultrasound screening has led to overtreatment and higher follow-up rates than are found with clinical examination alone because of high incidence of physiologically immature hips (type IIa) in the first weeks of life. The ability to predict future acetabular development in physi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 2014-09, Vol.34 (6), p.591-596
Hauptverfasser: Yavuz, Osman Y, Uras, Ismail, Tasbas, Bulent A, Ozdemir, Mustafa H, Kaya, Mustafa, Komurcu, Mahmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Universal ultrasound screening has led to overtreatment and higher follow-up rates than are found with clinical examination alone because of high incidence of physiologically immature hips (type IIa) in the first weeks of life. The ability to predict future acetabular development in physiologically immature hips (type IIa) would therefore help to reduce overtreatment and unnecessary follow-up. METHODS:We described the γ-angle to assess the femoral head coverage by the acetabular roof, which is measured between the baseline defined by Graf and the cartilaginous edge line connecting the inferior point of the iliac bone (lower limb) to the medial corner of the acetabular labrum. We retrospectively analyzed ultrasonographic findings of infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed in our hospital and infants with normal hips screened in our hospital. Group 1 (35 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into dysplastic hips at follow-up. Group 2 (279 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into normal hips (type I) at follow-up. RESULTS:The γ-angles of type IIa hips that developed into type I hip at follow-up ranged between 77 and 82. The γ-angles of type IIa hips that developed into hip dysplasia ranged between 72 and 78. All type IIa hips that had γ-angles >78 degrees developed into normal hips. We also observed that all type IIa hips that had γ-angles
ISSN:0271-6798
1539-2570
DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000159