Clinical outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinoma and microcarcinoma

Abstract Introduction Due to the frequent use of neck ultrasonography, the incidence of differentiated thyroid microcarcinoma (DTMC), defined as a lesion with greatest dimension ≤1 cm, is increasing worldwide. Although DTMC generally has a lower aggressivity and a better prognosis than differentiate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2014, Vol.12, p.S148-S151
Hauptverfasser: Lupoli, Roberta, Cacciapuoti, Marianna, Tortora, Anna, Barba, Livia, Verde, Nunzia, Romano, Fiammetta, Vastarella, Maria, Fonderico, Francesco, Masone, Stefania, Milone, Marco, Lupoli, Giovanni, Lupoli, Gelsy Arianna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Due to the frequent use of neck ultrasonography, the incidence of differentiated thyroid microcarcinoma (DTMC), defined as a lesion with greatest dimension ≤1 cm, is increasing worldwide. Although DTMC generally has a lower aggressivity and a better prognosis than differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), some cases of clinically aggressive DTMC were found. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of recurrence in DTMC and DTC, during a 3-year follow-up. Methods Patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, who underwent total thyroidectomy and postoperative131 I-RAI ablation, were stratified according to lesion diameter (DTC for diameter > 1 cm or DTMC ≤ 1 cm). After surgery, patients underwent a 3-year follow-up. Recurrent disease was defined on the basis of positive biochemical (Tg > 2 ng/ml under TSH-suppression or after rhTSH-stimulation) and/or imaging (US, WBS, CT, PET/CT) findings. Results 449 patients have been included in the final analysis. Linfoadenectomy rate and RAI ablative dose were significantly higher in DTC than in DTMC (32.7% vs. 22.4%, p  = 0.018 and112.3 ± 21 vs. 68.3 ± 24.1 mCi, p  
ISSN:1743-9191
1743-9159
DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.024