Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis (5-Year Outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

Ischemic heart disease is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, long-term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in those patients is still unclear in the drug-eluting stent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2014-08, Vol.114 (4), p.555-561
Hauptverfasser: Marui, Akira, MD, PhD, Kimura, Takeshi, MD, PhD, Nishiwaki, Noboru, MD, PhD, Mitsudo, Kazuaki, MD, PhD, Komiya, Tatsuhiko, MD, Hanyu, Michiya, MD, PhD, Shiomi, Hiroki, MD, PhD, Tanaka, Shiro, PhD, Sakata, Ryuzo, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ischemic heart disease is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, long-term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in those patients is still unclear in the drug-eluting stent era. We identified 388 patients with multivessel and/or left main disease with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis among 15,939 patients undergoing first coronary revascularization enrolled in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 (PCI: 258 patients and CABG: 130 patients). The CABG group included more patients with 3-vessel (38% vs 57%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034