The Power of Reordering for Online Minimum Makespan Scheduling

In the classic minimum makespan scheduling problem, we are given an input sequence of jobs with processing times. A scheduling algorithm has to assign the jobs to $m$ parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the makespan, which is the time it takes until all jobs are processed. In this paper,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SIAM journal on computing 2014-01, Vol.43 (3), p.1220-1237
Hauptverfasser: Englert, Matthias, Ozmen, Deniz, Westermann, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the classic minimum makespan scheduling problem, we are given an input sequence of jobs with processing times. A scheduling algorithm has to assign the jobs to $m$ parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the makespan, which is the time it takes until all jobs are processed. In this paper, we consider online scheduling algorithms without preemption. However, we do not require that each arriving job has to be assigned immediately to one of the machines. A reordering buffer with limited storage capacity can be used to reorder the input sequence in a restricted fashion so as to schedule the jobs with a smaller makespan. This is a natural extension of lookahead. We present an extensive study of the power and limits of online reordering for minimum makespan scheduling. As a main result, we give, for $m$ identical machines, tight and, in comparison to the problem without reordering, much improved bounds on the competitive ratio for minimum makespan scheduling with reordering buffers. Depending on $m$, the achieved competitive ratio lies between 4/3 and 1.4659. This optimal ratio is achieved with a buffer of size $\Theta(m)$. We show that larger buffer sizes do not result in an additional advantage and that a buffer of size $\Omega(m)$ is necessary to achieve this competitive ratio. Further, we present several algorithms for different buffer sizes. For $m$ uniformly related machines, we give a scheduling algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of 2 with a reordering buffer of size $m$. Considering that the best known competitive ratio for uniformly related machines without reordering is 5.828, this result further emphasizes the power of online reordering. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0097-5397
1095-7111
DOI:10.1137/130919738