Vulnerability Assessment Model for Cost Efficient Anti-terrorism Design of Super High-Rise Buildings

The purpose of this study is to select architectural design elements of super high-rise buildings to protect them from terrorism using explosives and to develop a vulnerability assessment model which can take into account the relative importance of each design element in anti-terrorism and the suppl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering 2014, Vol.13 (2), p.413-420
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Kyung-Yeon, Lee, Kyung-Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study is to select architectural design elements of super high-rise buildings to protect them from terrorism using explosives and to develop a vulnerability assessment model which can take into account the relative importance of each design element in anti-terrorism and the supplementary effects among them for achieving cost efficient architectural design. Four layers of defense and 27 architectural design elements were selected and the design elements were categorized into 7 supplementary groups based on their purpose and function. Then, design guidelines for each element were classified into 5 grades on the basis of its protection or risk level. Weights of each element were extracted through an AHP survey by anti-terrorism specialists. The results imply that the vulnerability of high-rise buildings to terrorism would be affected the most by the circumstances of the building and neighborhood, and the modification of heavily weighted design elements for separating unauthorized vehicles from a tower and blocking them outside of the site could be the most efficient design measures to counter terrorism. As a vulnerability assessment model, a bottom-up formula was suggested. To reflect the supplementary effects among design elements in the same group, an evaluation level integration methodology was included.
ISSN:1346-7581
1347-2852
DOI:10.3130/jaabe.13.413