The effects of golimumab on subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in ankylosing spondylitis—a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial

Objective. Our aim was to ascertain the efficacy of golimumab compared with placebo in the prevention of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in AS. Methods. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study was performed in which AS patients were treated with golimumab (n = 20) and place...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2014-06, Vol.53 (6), p.1065-1074
Hauptverfasser: Tam, Lai-Shan, Shang, Qing, Kun, Emily W., Lee, Ka-Lai, Yip, Man-Lung, Li, Martin, Li, Tena K., Zhu, Tracy Y., Pui, Michelle O., Li, Edmund K., Yu, Cheuk-Man
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective. Our aim was to ascertain the efficacy of golimumab compared with placebo in the prevention of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in AS. Methods. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study was performed in which AS patients were treated with golimumab (n = 20) and placebo (n = 21) for 12 months. Patients from the placebo group who failed to achieve a 20% response to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria (ASAS20) at 6 months received open-label golimumab. Intima–media thickness (IMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Results. At 6 months, 11/20 (55%) and 3/21 (14%) patients from the golimumab and placebo groups achieved an ASAS20 response, respectively (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the change of the vascular parameters between the two groups. In the placebo group, significantly greater progression of the mean IMT [from 0.51 mm (s.d. 0.07) at baseline to 0.53 mm (s.d. 0.08) at 6 months, P = 0.044] and PWV (from 12.2 m/s (s.d. 1.6) at baseline to 12.6 m/s (s.d. 1.3), P = 0.028] were observed. There was a trend towards progression of the mean IMT in the golimumab group (P = 0.099) but the maximum IMT, PWV and AIx remained unchanged. At 12 months the changes in vascular parameters were similar between the early and delayed (or no) golimumab groups. Conclusion. Uncontrolled inflammation may result in a significant progression in IMT and PWV in patients with AS. Arterial dysfunction may be prevented by golimumab over a period of 6 months, probably because of effective suppression of inflammation. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01212653)
ISSN:1462-0324
1462-0332
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/ket469