Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Summary Background A high incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) among patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) has been reported, with a strong correlation between obstructive sleep apnoea, ED, and quality of life (QOL), and it has been estimated that 10–60% of patients with OSAS suffer from ED. In this prospective randomised controlled trial, we investigated 82 men with ED consecutively who were referred to the outpatient clinic for sleep disorders and had severe OSAS (AHI> 30 events/h) without any other comorbidities as a possible cause of ED. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of sildenafil vs. continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in men with ED and severe OSAS. Methods Eighty‐two patients were randomised to two main treatment groups: group 1 patients (n = 41) were treated with 100‐mg sildenafil 1 h before sexual intercourse without CPAP, and group 2 patients (n = 41 men) were treated with only nasal CPAP during night time sleep. Both groups were evaluated with the same questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function‐EF domain; Sex Encounter Profile; Erectile Dysfunction Inventory Treatment Satisfaction) 12 weeks after treatment. Results In patients receiving sildenafil treatment, 58.2% of those who attempted sexual intercourses were successful compared to 30.4% in the CPAP group. The mean number of successful attempts per week was significantly higher in the sildenafil group compared with the CPAP group (2.9 vs. 1.7, respectively; p