Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla versus histology

ABSTRACT Introduction: We evaluated muscle/fat fraction (MFF) accuracy and reliability measured with an MR imaging technique at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanner strengths, using biopsy as reference. Methods: MRI was performed on muscle samples from pig and rabbit species (n = 8) at 1.5T and 3.0T. A ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2014-08, Vol.50 (2), p.170-176
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Andrew C., Parrish, Todd B., Abbott, Rebecca, Hoggarth, Mark A., Mendoza, Karl, Chen, Yu Fen, Elliott, James M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Introduction: We evaluated muscle/fat fraction (MFF) accuracy and reliability measured with an MR imaging technique at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanner strengths, using biopsy as reference. Methods: MRI was performed on muscle samples from pig and rabbit species (n = 8) at 1.5T and 3.0T. A chemical shift based 2‐point Dixon method was used, collecting in‐phase and out‐of‐phase data for fat/water of muscle samples. Values were compared with MFFs calculated from histology. Results: No significant difference was found between 1.5T and 3.0T (P values = 0.41–0.96), or between histology and imaging (P = 0.83) for any muscle tested. Conclusions: Results suggest that a 2‐point Dixon fat/water separation MRI technique may provide reliable quantification of MFFs at varying field strengths across different animal species, and consistency was established with biopsy. The results set a foundation for larger scale investigation of quantifying muscle fat in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 50:170–176, 2014
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.24255