Correspondence Between Training Load Executed by Volleyball Players and the One Observed by Coaches
ABSTRACTRodríguez-Marroyo, JA, Medina, J, García-López, J, García-Tormo, JV, and Foster, C. Correspondence between training load executed by volleyball players and the one observed by coaches. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1588–1594, 2014—The main aim of this study was to compare the training load (TL) e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2014-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1588-1594 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACTRodríguez-Marroyo, JA, Medina, J, García-López, J, García-Tormo, JV, and Foster, C. Correspondence between training load executed by volleyball players and the one observed by coaches. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1588–1594, 2014—The main aim of this study was to compare the training load (TL) executed by volleyball players with that observed by coaches. Second, we analyzed the influence of the coachesʼ experience in the estimated TL. Twelve female volleyball players and 4 male coaches participated in this study. During a period of 15 weeks, physical (PT) and technical-tactical training sessions and matches were monitored. In each session, the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) was recorded to analyze the playersʼ exercise intensity and TLRPE. Coaches were present in all sessions and rated their estimate of sRPE at the same time as the players to calculate the coachesʼ TLRPE. Both playersʼ and coachesʼ mean sRPE (4.0 ± 1.1, 3.7 ± 1.1, and 3.8 ± 1.0 in players and expert and beginning coaches, respectively) and TLRPE (380.1 ± 106.8, 358.3 ± 110.5, and 359.7 ± 108.0 in players and expert and beginning coaches, respectively) were similar. However, a higher (p < 0.01) sRPE and TLRPE were observed in the players during PT. In general, the weekly TLRPE variation over the course of this study was similar in players and coaches. The playersʼ sRPE and TLRPE were correlated (p < 0.01) with expert and beginner coachesʼ RPE (r = 0.70 and 0.72, respectively) and TLRPE (r = 0.75 and 0.76, respectively). In conclusion, the present findings show the correspondence between playersʼ and coachesʼ sRPE and TLRPE regardless of their experience. Hence, coachesʼ TLRPE could be a useful and practical method to monitor and control the TL and other derived parameters in an easy way during volleyball. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
DOI: | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000324 |