Membrane Damage Efficiency of Phenothiazinium Photosensitizers

Structure–activity relationships have been widely reported for porphyrin and phthalocyanine photosensitizers, but not for phenothiazinium derivatives. Here, four phenothiazinium salts (methylene blue, toluidine blue O, 1,9‐dimethyl methylene blue and the pentacyclic derivative DO15) were used to inv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photochemistry and photobiology 2014-07, Vol.90 (4), p.801-813
Hauptverfasser: Bacellar, Isabel O. L., Pavani, Christiane, Sales, Elisa M., Itri, Rosangela, Wainwright, Mark, Baptista, Mauricio S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Structure–activity relationships have been widely reported for porphyrin and phthalocyanine photosensitizers, but not for phenothiazinium derivatives. Here, four phenothiazinium salts (methylene blue, toluidine blue O, 1,9‐dimethyl methylene blue and the pentacyclic derivative DO15) were used to investigate how the ability to damage membranes is affected by membrane/solution partition, photophysical properties and tendency to aggregation of the photosensitizer. These two latter aspects were studied both in isotropic solutions and in membranes. Membrane damage was assessed by leakage of a fluorescent probe entrapped in liposomes and by generation of thiobarbituric acid‐reactive species (TBARS), while structural changes at the lipid bilayer were detected by small‐angle X‐ray scattering. We observed that all compounds had similar singlet‐oxygen quantum yields in ethanol, but only the photosensitizers that had higher membrane/solution partition (1,9‐dimethyl methylene blue and DO15, the latter having the higher value) could permeabilize the lipid bilayer. Moreover, of these two photosensitizers, only DO15 altered membrane structure, a result that was attributed to its destabilization of higher order aggregates, generation of higher amounts of singlet oxygen within the membranes and effective electron‐transfer reaction within its dimers. We concluded that membrane‐based protocols can provide a better insight on the photodynamic efficiency of the photosensitizer. Structure–activity relationships were investigated for a series of phenothiazinium photosensitizers (methylene blue, toluidine blue O, 1,9‐dimethyl methylene blue and DO15). We compared the ability of these compounds to damage membranes by quantifying the efficiency of liposome permeabilization, which was correlated with singlet‐oxygen generation within the membranes, membrane/solution partition and tendency of aggregation of the photosensitizers. We concluded that membrane‐based protocols can provide a better understanding on the photodynamic efficiency of the photosensitizer.
ISSN:0031-8655
1751-1097
DOI:10.1111/php.12264