MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Mat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1387 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Kaasalainen, Touko Pakarinen, Sami Kivistö, Sari Holmström, Miia Hänninen, Helena Peltonen, Juha Lauerma, Kirsi Sipilä, Outi |
description | Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542003318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X14002228</els_id><sourcerecordid>1542003318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAQx0VoaTZpnyBQdOzFm9GHLfmQlhKaD0gJNC30JmRpnMj12lvJm7K3vEPesE9SbTbJIZfCwFx-_xnmN4QcMJgzYNVhN8cuWj_nwOQccnG-Q2ZMK14oxdUrMgPFoQCpf-6SvZQ6AChlzd-QXS615kqLGfn09ds5_ROmG-ps9ME6urQuDNfU421wmOjfu3t6ZVuc1jQM1PVhCM72dBmtmzLwlrxubZ_w3WPfJz9Ovnw_PisuLk_Pjz9fFE5qORWtqLWTHirbCil47RlUypetsLaU4JhQnNWuFqXyWtcCm8YiiMpWddUI1XixTz5s5y7j-HuFaTKLkBz2vR1wXCXDSskBhGA6o2KLujimFLE1yxgWNq4NA7MxZzrzYM5szBnIxXlOvX9csGoW6J8zT6oycLQFMJ95GzCa5AIODn2I6Cbjx_CfBR9f5J9k_sI1pm5cxSEbNMwkbsBcbZ63-R2TkONci3_uyJPl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542003318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24882783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Cardiac pacemaker ; Electrocardiography ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Oximetry ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Patient Safety ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety Management ; Safety protocol</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24882783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivistö, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmström, Miia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hänninen, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauerma, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cardiac pacemaker</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>Safety protocol</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAQx0VoaTZpnyBQdOzFm9GHLfmQlhKaD0gJNC30JmRpnMj12lvJm7K3vEPesE9SbTbJIZfCwFx-_xnmN4QcMJgzYNVhN8cuWj_nwOQccnG-Q2ZMK14oxdUrMgPFoQCpf-6SvZQ6AChlzd-QXS615kqLGfn09ds5_ROmG-ps9ME6urQuDNfU421wmOjfu3t6ZVuc1jQM1PVhCM72dBmtmzLwlrxubZ_w3WPfJz9Ovnw_PisuLk_Pjz9fFE5qORWtqLWTHirbCil47RlUypetsLaU4JhQnNWuFqXyWtcCm8YiiMpWddUI1XixTz5s5y7j-HuFaTKLkBz2vR1wXCXDSskBhGA6o2KLujimFLE1yxgWNq4NA7MxZzrzYM5szBnIxXlOvX9csGoW6J8zT6oycLQFMJ95GzCa5AIODn2I6Cbjx_CfBR9f5J9k_sI1pm5cxSEbNMwkbsBcbZ63-R2TkONci3_uyJPl</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Kaasalainen, Touko</creator><creator>Pakarinen, Sami</creator><creator>Kivistö, Sari</creator><creator>Holmström, Miia</creator><creator>Hänninen, Helena</creator><creator>Peltonen, Juha</creator><creator>Lauerma, Kirsi</creator><creator>Sipilä, Outi</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><author>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cardiac pacemaker</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>Safety protocol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivistö, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmström, Miia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hänninen, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauerma, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaasalainen, Touko</au><au>Pakarinen, Sami</au><au>Kivistö, Sari</au><au>Holmström, Miia</au><au>Hänninen, Helena</au><au>Peltonen, Juha</au><au>Lauerma, Kirsi</au><au>Sipilä, Outi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1387</spage><epage>1395</epage><pages>1387-1395</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>24882783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542003318 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Algorithms Cardiac pacemaker Electrocardiography Equipment Design Equipment Failure Equipment Safety Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Oximetry Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects Patient Safety Radiology Retrospective Studies Safety Management Safety protocol |
title | MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20with%20cardiac%20pacing%20devices%20%E2%80%93%20Safety%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Kaasalainen,%20Touko&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1387&rft.epage=1395&rft.pages=1387-1395&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1542003318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542003318&rft_id=info:pmid/24882783&rft_els_id=S0720048X14002228&rfr_iscdi=true |