MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395
Hauptverfasser: Kaasalainen, Touko, Pakarinen, Sami, Kivistö, Sari, Holmström, Miia, Hänninen, Helena, Peltonen, Juha, Lauerma, Kirsi, Sipilä, Outi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1395
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1387
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 83
creator Kaasalainen, Touko
Pakarinen, Sami
Kivistö, Sari
Holmström, Miia
Hänninen, Helena
Peltonen, Juha
Lauerma, Kirsi
Sipilä, Outi
description Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542003318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X14002228</els_id><sourcerecordid>1542003318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAQx0VoaTZpnyBQdOzFm9GHLfmQlhKaD0gJNC30JmRpnMj12lvJm7K3vEPesE9SbTbJIZfCwFx-_xnmN4QcMJgzYNVhN8cuWj_nwOQccnG-Q2ZMK14oxdUrMgPFoQCpf-6SvZQ6AChlzd-QXS615kqLGfn09ds5_ROmG-ps9ME6urQuDNfU421wmOjfu3t6ZVuc1jQM1PVhCM72dBmtmzLwlrxubZ_w3WPfJz9Ovnw_PisuLk_Pjz9fFE5qORWtqLWTHirbCil47RlUypetsLaU4JhQnNWuFqXyWtcCm8YiiMpWddUI1XixTz5s5y7j-HuFaTKLkBz2vR1wXCXDSskBhGA6o2KLujimFLE1yxgWNq4NA7MxZzrzYM5szBnIxXlOvX9csGoW6J8zT6oycLQFMJ95GzCa5AIODn2I6Cbjx_CfBR9f5J9k_sI1pm5cxSEbNMwkbsBcbZ63-R2TkONci3_uyJPl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542003318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24882783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Cardiac pacemaker ; Electrocardiography ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Oximetry ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Patient Safety ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety Management ; Safety protocol</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24882783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivistö, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmström, Miia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hänninen, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauerma, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cardiac pacemaker</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>Safety protocol</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAQx0VoaTZpnyBQdOzFm9GHLfmQlhKaD0gJNC30JmRpnMj12lvJm7K3vEPesE9SbTbJIZfCwFx-_xnmN4QcMJgzYNVhN8cuWj_nwOQccnG-Q2ZMK14oxdUrMgPFoQCpf-6SvZQ6AChlzd-QXS615kqLGfn09ds5_ROmG-ps9ME6urQuDNfU421wmOjfu3t6ZVuc1jQM1PVhCM72dBmtmzLwlrxubZ_w3WPfJz9Ovnw_PisuLk_Pjz9fFE5qORWtqLWTHirbCil47RlUypetsLaU4JhQnNWuFqXyWtcCm8YiiMpWddUI1XixTz5s5y7j-HuFaTKLkBz2vR1wXCXDSskBhGA6o2KLujimFLE1yxgWNq4NA7MxZzrzYM5szBnIxXlOvX9csGoW6J8zT6oycLQFMJ95GzCa5AIODn2I6Cbjx_CfBR9f5J9k_sI1pm5cxSEbNMwkbsBcbZ63-R2TkONci3_uyJPl</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Kaasalainen, Touko</creator><creator>Pakarinen, Sami</creator><creator>Kivistö, Sari</creator><creator>Holmström, Miia</creator><creator>Hänninen, Helena</creator><creator>Peltonen, Juha</creator><creator>Lauerma, Kirsi</creator><creator>Sipilä, Outi</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</title><author>Kaasalainen, Touko ; Pakarinen, Sami ; Kivistö, Sari ; Holmström, Miia ; Hänninen, Helena ; Peltonen, Juha ; Lauerma, Kirsi ; Sipilä, Outi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f398c4d06af34329d1067d5f3aa540c137219c9357d8893ebbae036a696b37bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cardiac pacemaker</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>Safety protocol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaasalainen, Touko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivistö, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmström, Miia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hänninen, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauerma, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipilä, Outi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaasalainen, Touko</au><au>Pakarinen, Sami</au><au>Kivistö, Sari</au><au>Holmström, Miia</au><au>Hänninen, Helena</au><au>Peltonen, Juha</au><au>Lauerma, Kirsi</au><au>Sipilä, Outi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1387</spage><epage>1395</epage><pages>1387-1395</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to introduce a single centre “real life” experience of performing MRI examinations in clinical practice on patients with cardiac pacemaker systems. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the safety of using a dedicated safety protocol for these patients. Materials and methods We used a 1.5 T MRI scanner to conduct 68 MRI scans of different body regions in patients with pacing systems. Of the cardiac devices, 32% were MR-conditional, whereas the remaining 68% were MR-unsafe. We recorded the functional parameters of the devices prior, immediately after, and approximately one month after the MRI scanning, and compared the device parameters to the baseline values. Results All MRI examinations were completed safely, and each device could be interrogated normally following the MRI. We observed no changes in the programmed parameters of the devices. For most of the participants, the distributions of the immediate and one-month changes in the device parameters were within 20% of the baseline values, although some changes approached clinically important thresholds. Furthermore, we observed no differences in the variable changes between MR-conditional and MR-unsafe pacing systems, or between scans of the thorax area and other scanned areas. Conclusion MRI in patients with MR-conditional pacing systems and selected MR-unsafe systems could be performed safely under strict conditions in this study.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>24882783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2014-08, Vol.83 (8), p.1387-1395
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542003318
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Cardiac pacemaker
Electrocardiography
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Equipment Safety
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Oximetry
Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects
Patient Safety
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Safety Management
Safety protocol
title MRI with cardiac pacing devices – Safety in clinical practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20with%20cardiac%20pacing%20devices%20%E2%80%93%20Safety%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Kaasalainen,%20Touko&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1387&rft.epage=1395&rft.pages=1387-1395&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1542003318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542003318&rft_id=info:pmid/24882783&rft_els_id=S0720048X14002228&rfr_iscdi=true