Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching?

•Different groups of bilinguals and monolinguals performed 3 task-switching implementations.•Bilingualism does not affect the ability of switching between different tasks.•Bilingualism impacts the ability to restart a previous task.•Effects of bilingualism are observed in settings engaging higher co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 2013-10, Vol.69 (3), p.257-276
Hauptverfasser: Hernández, Mireia, Martin, Clara D., Barceló, Francisco, Costa, Albert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Different groups of bilinguals and monolinguals performed 3 task-switching implementations.•Bilingualism does not affect the ability of switching between different tasks.•Bilingualism impacts the ability to restart a previous task.•Effects of bilingualism are observed in settings engaging higher cognitive demands. Based on previous reports of bilinguals’ reduced non-linguistic switch cost, we explored how bilingualism affects various task-switching mechanisms. We tested different groups of Spanish monolinguals and highly-proficient Catalan–Spanish bilinguals in different task-switching implementations. In Experiment 1 we disengaged the restart cost typically occurring after a cue from the switch cost itself using two cue–task versions varying in explicitness. In Experiment 2 we tested bilingualism effects on overriding conflicting response sets by including bivalency effects. In Experiment 3 we attempted to replicate the reduced switch cost of bilinguals with the same implementation as in previous studies. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed a reduced restart cost in the implicit cue–task version of Experiment 1 and overall faster response latencies in Experiment 2. However, bilinguals did not show reduced switch cost in any experiment – not even in an omnibus analysis combining the standardized switch cost scores of 292 participants across the three experiments. These results qualify previous claims about bilingualism reducing non-linguistic switch costs.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.004