Attention to the speaker. The conscious assessment of utterance interpretations in working memory
► I show that attentional processes have an important – though scarcely addressed – role to play in language understanding. ► Specifically, they can explain how speaker-related information does normally gain prominence in utterance understanding. ► This is because representation of the speaker in wo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language & communication 2013-04, Vol.33 (2), p.106-114 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► I show that attentional processes have an important – though scarcely addressed – role to play in language understanding. ► Specifically, they can explain how speaker-related information does normally gain prominence in utterance understanding. ► This is because representation of the speaker in working memory enhances the activation of speaker-related information. ► Such a mechanism involves the cooperation between attention and associative processes. ► Therefore, associative accounts in pragmatics must (and can) be complemented by consideration of attentional processes.
The role of conscious attention in language processing has been scarcely considered, despite the wide-spread assumption that verbal utterances manage to attract and manipulate the addressee’s attention. Here I claim that this assumption is to be understood not as a figure of speech but instead in terms of attentional processes proper. This hypothesis can explain a fact that has been noticed by supporters of Relevance Theory in pragmatics: the special role played by speaker-related information in utterance interpretation. I argue that representation of the speaker in working memory reliably enhances the activation of speaker-related information and, consequently, the role it plays in determining the content of interpretations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0271-5309 1873-3395 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.001 |