Differential outcomes training improves face recognition memory in children and in adults with Down syndrome

•We study the effect of using specific outcomes on children's face recognition memory.•Children exhibit better recognition performance when specific outcomes are arranged.•Differential outcomes also improve face recognition in adults with Down syndrome. Previous studies have demonstrated that t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in developmental disabilities 2014-06, Vol.35 (6), p.1384-1392
Hauptverfasser: Esteban, Laura, Plaza, Victoria, López-Crespo, Ginesa, Vivas, Ana B., Estévez, Angeles F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We study the effect of using specific outcomes on children's face recognition memory.•Children exhibit better recognition performance when specific outcomes are arranged.•Differential outcomes also improve face recognition in adults with Down syndrome. Previous studies have demonstrated that the differential outcomes procedure (DOP), which involves paring a unique reward with a specific stimulus, enhances discriminative learning and memory performance in several populations. The present study aimed to further investigate whether this procedure would improve face recognition memory in 5- and 7-year-old children (Experiment 1) and adults with Down syndrome (Experiment 2). In a delayed matching-to-sample task, participants had to select the previously shown face (sample stimulus) among six alternatives faces (comparison stimuli) in four different delays (1, 5, 10, or 15s). Participants were tested in two conditions: differential, where each sample stimulus was paired with a specific outcome; and non-differential outcomes, where reinforcers were administered randomly. The results showed a significantly better face recognition in the differential outcomes condition relative to the non-differential in both experiments. Implications for memory training programs and future research are discussed.
ISSN:0891-4222
1873-3379
DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.031