Effects of compaction and UV exposure on performance of acrylate/glass-fiber composites cured layer by layer

With an aim to reducing manufacturing costs, in general and specifically to provide a solution to the thick laminate curing depth issue for composite materials, UV curing technology was combined with a fiber placement process to fabricate acrylate/glass‐fiber composites. A novel layer‐by‐layer UV in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2012-03, Vol.123 (6), p.3799-3805
Hauptverfasser: Duan, Yugang, Li, Jia, Zhong, Weihong, Maguire, Russell G., Zhao, Guoqiang, Xie, Hong, Li, Dichen, Lu, Bingheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With an aim to reducing manufacturing costs, in general and specifically to provide a solution to the thick laminate curing depth issue for composite materials, UV curing technology was combined with a fiber placement process to fabricate acrylate/glass‐fiber composites. A novel layer‐by‐layer UV in situ curing method was employed in this article and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) tests and SEM were used to evaluate the effect of processing parameters, including compaction force and UV exposure dose, on ILSS. The SEM images from short‐beam strength test samples and the results of ILSS showed that the fibers' distribution was uniform in the cured matrix resin resulting from the compaction forces and that beneficially influenced the ILSS of the composite greatly. However, the matrix resin produced large shrinkage stresses when it reached a high degree of conversion (DC) in one‐step, which resulted in poor interlaminar adhesion. In addition, the fast curing speed of UV on the composite resulted in poor wetting between fiber and resin, and accordingly resulted in lower ILSS. To overcome these problems and obtain high ILSS value composites, an optimized compaction force and UV exposure dose were determined experimentally. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/app.34909