Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries

Wall shear stress (WSS) is involved in many pathophysiological processes related to cardiovascular diseases, and knowledge of WSS may provide vital information on disease progression. WSS is generally quantified with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), but can also be calculated using phase contrast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NMR in biomedicine 2014-07, Vol.27 (7), p.826-834
Hauptverfasser: Cibis, Merih, Potters, Wouter V., Gijsen, Frank J. H., Marquering, Henk, vanBavel, Ed, van der Steen, Antonius F. W., Nederveen, Aart J., Wentzel, Jolanda J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Wall shear stress (WSS) is involved in many pathophysiological processes related to cardiovascular diseases, and knowledge of WSS may provide vital information on disease progression. WSS is generally quantified with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), but can also be calculated using phase contrast MRI (PC‐MRI) measurements. In this study, our objectives were to calculate WSS on the entire luminal surface of human carotid arteries using PC‐MRI velocities (WSSMRI) and to compare it with WSS based on CFD (WSSCFD).Six healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3 T MRI scanner. WSSCFD was calculated using a generalized flow waveform with a mean flow equal to the mean measured flow. WSSMRI was calculated by estimating the velocity gradient along the inward normal of each mesh node on the luminal surface. Furthermore, WSS was calculated for a down‐sampled CFD velocity field mimicking the MRI resolution (WSSCFDlowres). To ensure minimum temporal variation, WSS was analyzed only at diastole. The patterns of WSSCFD and WSSMRI were compared by quantifying the overlap between low, medium and high WSS tertiles. Finally, WSS directions were compared by calculating the angles between the WSSCFD and WSSMRI vectors.WSSMRI magnitude was found to be lower than WSSCFD (0.62 ± 0.18 Pa versus 0.88 ± 0.30 Pa, p 
ISSN:0952-3480
1099-1492
DOI:10.1002/nbm.3126