Use of the Vascu-Guard Bovine Pericardium Patch for Arteriotomy Closure in Carotid Endarterectomy. Early and Long-Term Results

Background To report the early and long-term results of Vascu-Guard bovine pericardium (BP) for patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 256 CEAs with BP patch closure performed in 238 patients during the past 12 years in our department. Patc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2014-07, Vol.28 (5), p.1213-1218
Hauptverfasser: Papakostas, John C, Avgos, Stavros, Arnaoutoglou, Eleni, Nassis, Christos, Peroulis, Michalis, Bali, Christina, Papadopoulos, George, Matsagkas, Miltiadis I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To report the early and long-term results of Vascu-Guard bovine pericardium (BP) for patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 256 CEAs with BP patch closure performed in 238 patients during the past 12 years in our department. Patch-related complications (restenosis, infection, and aneurysm formation) and early and late (12 to 144 months follow-up) clinical outcomes were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results Thirty-day postoperative stroke rate was 1.2% (3/256) with zero mortality. Major complications occurred in 3.5% (9 of 256) of the procedures and cranial nerve injury in 4.3% (11 of 256). At 12 years, cumulative estimates of freedom from any stroke, stroke-free survival, and freedom from restenosis were 88.4% (standard error [SE]: 3.3%), 60% (SE: 7.8%), and 98.3% (SE: 0.8%), respectively. No patient experienced patch infection or aneurysm formation. Conclusions This series shows the efficacy, safety, and durability of CEA with BP patch closure, in both the short and long term. BP combines the advantages of vein and synthetic patches, representing a suitable option when performing CEA.
ISSN:0890-5096
1615-5947
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.021