A Canadian multicenter study with Zaditen (ketotifen) in the treatment of bronchial asthma in children aged 5 to 17 years

One hundred thirty-eight children with chronic asthma, requiring daily treatment with bronchodilators, took part in a 7-month, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. Patients were randomized into two groups, and after a 1-month baseline, were administered Zaditen (ketotifen), 1.0 mg twice daily,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1989-09, Vol.84 (3), p.286-296
Hauptverfasser: Rackham, A., Brown, C.A., Chandra, R.K., Ho, P., Hoogerwerf, P.E., Kennedy, R.J., Knight, A., Langer, H., Milne, J., Moote, D.W., Nickerson, G.H., Rosen, L., Stephenson, H., Broadhead, M., Lalonde, Y., St-Pierre, J-P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One hundred thirty-eight children with chronic asthma, requiring daily treatment with bronchodilators, took part in a 7-month, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. Patients were randomized into two groups, and after a 1-month baseline, were administered Zaditen (ketotifen), 1.0 mg twice daily, or an identical placebo for a period of 6 months. After 10 weeks of receiving the study medication, bronchodilator use was reduced or stopped. In the Zaditen-treated group, 60% of the children taking theophylline were able to stop its use completely, compared to 34% of the patients taking placebo ( p < 0.05). Of the patients who were unable to stop taking theophylline, the Zaditen- and placebo-treated groups recorded average dosage reductions of 62% and 26%, respectively. These differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Thus, a high percentage of patients in the placebo-treated group maintained asthma symptom control with theophylline, whereas most of the Zaditen-treated patients could stop using this medication. Although pulmonary function readings improved in both groups, those patients taking Zaditen demonstrated earlier improvement and greater changes from baseline. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) in favor of Zaditen were found for reduction of concomitant medications, patient's global evaluation, physician's clinical evaluations, incidence of emergency room visits for asthma, and upper respiratory tract infections. No unexpected side effects were observed. It is concluded that Zaditen is an effective medication for long-term control of asthma in children.
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(89)90410-7