A reaction to Jackendoff's discussion note

A reaction to Jackendoff's discussion note

Seuren responds to Ray Jackendoff's discussion note 'What is the human language faculty? Two views' (Language, September 2011). While Seuren agrees with Jackendoff's argument against Chomskyan minimalism, especially against Merge as a basic operation in that theory, he contends t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language (Baltimore) 2012-03, Vol.88 (1), p.174-176
1. Verfasser: Seuren, Pieter A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Architectural control
Architecture
Brain
DISCUSSION NOTES
Generative grammar
Grammar, Comparative and general
Jackendoff, Ray
Language
Language acquisition
Language comprehension
Linguistic theory
Linguistics
Performance theory
Psychologists
Sentences
Sociolinguistics
Theoretical linguistics
Thought and thinking
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Seuren responds to Ray Jackendoff's discussion note 'What is the human language faculty? Two views' (Language, September 2011). While Seuren agrees with Jackendoff's argument against Chomskyan minimalism, especially against Merge as a basic operation in that theory, he contends that "something odd appears to have occurred in Jackendoff's treatment of the issue." Adapted from the source document
ISSN:0097-8507
1535-0665
1535-0665
DOI:10.1353/lan.2012.0015