‘P.S.’: THE DANGEROUS LOGIC OF THE POSTSCRIPT IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE
This article examinespostscriptsboth as a feature ofeighteenth-century lettersand as a literary device. Although postscripts could be used for entirely banal purposes such as sending regards or expressing thanks for a gift, their fictional usage was governed by a more specialized set of conventions....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Modern language review 2014-01, Vol.109 (1), p.35-53 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article examinespostscriptsboth as a feature ofeighteenth-century lettersand as a literary device. Although postscripts could be used for entirely banal purposes such as sending regards or expressing thanks for a gift, their fictional usage was governed by a more specialized set of conventions. The main contention of this article is that the temporal lag between a letter and its postscript allowed novelists such asRichardsonto explore new ways of manipulatingnarrative time. HenryFielding's spoof novella
Shamela
, with its numerous postscripts, can be seen as an ironic reflection on that aspect of Richardson's novelistic practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-7937 2222-4319 |
DOI: | 10.5699/modelangrevi.109.1.0035 |