Gram-negative bacteremia: Which empirical antibiotic therapy?

Given the increasing frequency of cefotaxime-resistant strains, third-generation cephalosporins (3GC e.g. cefotaxime, ceftriaxone) might not be recommended any longer as empirical antibiotic therapy for community-acquired Gram-negative bacteremia (CA-GNB). We conducted a multicenter prospective desc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Médecine et maladies infectieuses 2014-04, Vol.44 (4), p.159-166
Hauptverfasser: Shoai Tehrani, M., Hajage, D., Fihman, V., Tankovic, J., Cau, S., Day, N., Visseaux, C., Carbonnelle, E., Kouatchet, A., Cattoir, V., Nhan, T.X., Corvec, S., Jacquier, H., Jauréguy, F., Le Monnier, A., Morand, P., Zahar, J.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Given the increasing frequency of cefotaxime-resistant strains, third-generation cephalosporins (3GC e.g. cefotaxime, ceftriaxone) might not be recommended any longer as empirical antibiotic therapy for community-acquired Gram-negative bacteremia (CA-GNB). We conducted a multicenter prospective descriptive study including patients with CA-GNB. Two hundred and nineteen patients were included. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently isolated species in 63% (n=138) and 11% (n=24) of the cases, respectively. The prevalence of cefotaxime-resistance reached 18% (n=39) mostly due to intrinsic resistance (27 cases, 12%). The presence of invasive material (P
ISSN:0399-077X
1769-6690
DOI:10.1016/j.medmal.2014.01.013