Association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and head and neck cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies
Published data regarding the association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and head and neck cancer (HNC) susceptibility showed inconsistent results. This meta-analysis of eligible literatures was performed to draw a more precise estimation of the relationship. We systematically searched PubM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | DNA and cell biology 2014-06, Vol.33 (6), p.378-387 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Published data regarding the association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and head and neck cancer (HNC) susceptibility showed inconsistent results. This meta-analysis of eligible literatures was performed to draw a more precise estimation of the relationship. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with a time limit of Oct 28, 2013. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC susceptibility using random-effect model. A total of 27 case-control studies including 5942 cases and 9041 controls were included for analysis. Meta-analysis of total studies showed that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln variant carriers were not susceptible to HNC (AA vs. GG: OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.77-1.11; AG vs. GG: OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.76-1.44; the dominant model AA+AG vs. GG: OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.78-1.29; the recessive model AA vs. AG+GG: OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.71-1.16). Further, subgroup analyses by ethnicity and source of controls did not identify any significant associations of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with head and neck susceptibility in any populations. Our meta-analysis suggested that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism was not a risk factor for HNC susceptibility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1044-5498 1557-7430 |
DOI: | 10.1089/dna.2013.2269 |