Depressive symptoms among adolescents and older adults in Mexico City

Purpose Determine the structure of depressive symptoms among adolescents and older adults through the person-centered approach of latent class analysis (LCA). Methods The study is based on data from two independent samples collected in Mexico City (2,444 adolescents and 2,223 older adults) which inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2014-06, Vol.49 (6), p.953-960
Hauptverfasser: Sánchez-García, Sergio, García-Peña, Carmen, González-Forteza, Catalina, Jiménez-Tapia, Alberto, Gallo, Joseph J., Wagner, Fernando A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Determine the structure of depressive symptoms among adolescents and older adults through the person-centered approach of latent class analysis (LCA). Methods The study is based on data from two independent samples collected in Mexico City (2,444 adolescents and 2,223 older adults) which included the revised version of the CES-D. The presence or absence of depressed mood (dysphoria), diminished pleasure (anhedonia), drastic change in weight, sleep problems, thinking and concentration difficulties, excessive or inappropriate guilt, fatigue, psychomotor agitation/retardation, and suicide ideation were used in LCA to determine the structure of depressive symptoms for adolescents and older adults. Results Adolescents reported higher excessive or inappropriate guilt compared to older adults, while older adults had higher proportions of anhedonia, sleep problems, fatigue, and psychomotor agitation/retardation. Similar proportions were found in other symptoms. The LCA analysis showed the best fit with four latent classes (LC): LC 1, “symptoms suggestive of major depressive episode (MDE)” with prevalence of 5.9 % ( n  = 144) and 10.3 % ( n  = 230) among adolescents and older adults, respectively; LC 2, “probable MDE symptoms” 18.2 % ( n  = 446) and 23.0 % ( n  = 512); LC 3, “possible MDE” 27.7 % ( n  = 676) and 21.8 % ( n  = 485); LC 4, “without significant depressive symptoms” 48.2 % ( n  = 1,178) and 44.8 % ( n  = 996). The differences in item thresholds between the two groups (adolescents vs. older adults) were statistically significant (Wald test = 255.684, df  = 1, p  
ISSN:0933-7954
1433-9285
DOI:10.1007/s00127-014-0828-x